All address families are now documented in address_families.7,
which is already present in SEE ALSO section. Also, the AF_ALG
note contains dead link to kernel HTML documentation.
Signed-off-by: Nikola Forró <nforro@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
It has its own man page, so it probably makes sense to mention
it here.
* man2/socket.2 (.SH DESCRIPTION): Add mention of AF_VSOCK back.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
* man2/socket.2 (.SH DESCRIPTION): Mention that the list of
address families is Linux-specific.
* man7/address_families.7 (.SH DESCRIPTION): Likewise.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
* man2/sigaction.2 (.SS Undocumented): Provide information about
relation between the second argument of sa_handler and
uc_mcontext field of the struct ucontext structure.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Some architectures do provide an 'l_sysid' declaration in
struct flock; however, it is not used anyway.
* man2/fcntl.2 (.SH NOTES): Note that l_sysid field is not used on
Linux even if present on some architectures.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Remove crufty sentence suggesting use of deprecated capsetp(3) and
capgetp(3); the manual page for those functions has long (at least
as far back as 2007) noted that they are deprecated.
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
O_RSYNC is defined in <asm/fcntl.h> on HP PA-RISC, but is not
used anyway.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Add a note regarding other implementations of whiteout inodes
and update filesystem support information.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
This information is already summarized in syscall(2), so there's
no need to repeat it in each page.
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Some architectures (ab)use second return value register for additional
return value in some system calls. Let's describe this.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
As reported by Nadav Har'El in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197961
The write(2) manual page has this paragraph:
"On success, the number of bytes written is returned
(zero indicates nothing was written). It is not an error
if this number is smaller than the number of bytes
requested; this may happen for example because the disk
device was filled. See also NOTES."
I find a few problems with this paragraph:
1. It's not clear what "See also NOTES." refers to (does it
refer to anything?). What in the NOTES is relevant here?
2. The paragraph seems to suggest that write(2) of a
non-empty buffer may sometimes return even 0 in case of an
error like the device being filled. I think this is wrong
- if there was an error after already writing some number
of bytes, this non-zero number is returned. But if there's
an error before writing any bytes, -1 will be returned
(and the error reason in errno) - 0 will not be returned
unless the given count is 0 (that case is explained in the
following paragraph).
3. The paragraph doesn't explain what a user should do
after a short write (i.e., write(2) returning less than
count). How would the user know why there was an error, or
if there even was one? I think users should be told what
to do next because this information is part of how to use
this API correctly. I think users should be told to retry
the rest of the write (i.e., write(fd, buf+ret, count-ret)
and this will either succeed in writing some more data if
the error reason was solved, or the second write will
return -1 and the error reason in errno.
Reported-by: Nadav Har'El <nyh@math.technion.ac.il>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
ENOATTR is not a standard error code, but rather one that is
defined in 'libattr' as a synonym for ENODATA. The manual pages
should use the error code actually returned by the kernel APIs.
See also https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201995
Reported-by: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
alpha use v0 e.g. $0 as the return value register both in
syscall ABI and C ABI.
see also
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S#L479
The normal Alpha C ABI use a0~a5 to pass arguments and use v0 as
the return value register. See here
https://www2.cs.arizona.edu/projects/alto/Doc/local/alpha.register.html
The syscall ABI use v0 as the trap number, a0~a5 to pass arguments
and use a3 as a indicator (bool type) whether has a error occurred.
We can also see the libc's syscall wrapper implements at
https://code.woboq.org/userspace/glibc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/alpha/syscall.S.html
The v0 is the normal used as return register, and we can see the
return processing doesn't do anything about a0 which is the wrong
register of currently syscall(2) description.
p.s. I found this wrong description because I'm porting Go gc to
a new CPU architecture which is similar to Alpha, And I use the
wrong register at first, then I have inspect the kernel code and
objdump to ensure the right syscall ABI.
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Back in 2014 (37bee118ad) the text
describing when multiplexing happens was changed in a confusing way.
This is an attempt to clarify things a bit.
Signed-off-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Since 93e06c7a6453 ("mm: enable MADV_FREE for swapless system") we
handle MADV_FREE on a swapless system the same way as with the
swap available. Clarify that fact in the man page.
Reported-by: Niklas Hambüchen <mail@nh2.me>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Remove the old statement that PTRACE_O_TRACESYSGOOD may not work
on all architectures. As far as I can tell, all kernel code
properly tests PT_TRACESYSGOOD flag and sets the 7th bit in the
exit code passed to ptrace_notify().
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Michael Kerrisk