Introduced by Linux commit v4.12-rc1~64^3~304^2~1.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
The list of address families in this page is still
overwhelmingly long. So let's shorten it.
The removed entries are all in address_families(7).
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
There is too much detail in socket(2). Move most of it into
a new page instead.
Cowritten-by: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Add some information about some other address families present in
<linux/socket.h>.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
As truncate(3) should dispatch between truncate/truncate64,
as noted later in the page.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Note that clone() definition on IA-64 is the same as on
SH/Tile/Alpha, align __clone2 declarations in line with the
previous ones, add clone2 syscall prototype.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Perhaps some people might misunderstand memory allocated by
alloca() to be like other memory allocated on the stack: that when
the allocation (or the pointer to the allocation) goes out of
scope, the memory is freed. Add some text to prevent that
misunderstanding.
Reported-by: Robin Kuzmin <kuzmin.robin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Clarify the example by making an implied detail more explicit.
Quoting the Troy Engel on the problem with the original text:
The problem is "and a process in a sibling cgroup (sub2)"
(shown as PID 20124 here) - how did this get here? How do I
recreate this? Following this example, there's no mention of
how, it's out of place when following the instructions.
There is nothing in any of the cgroup files which contain
this (# grep freezer /proc/*/cgroup) while at this stage.
The intent is understood, however the man page seems to skip
a step to create this in the teaching example. We should add
whatever simple steps are needed to create the "process in a
sibling cgroup" as outlined so it makes sense - as written,
I have no clue where "sibling cgroup (sub2)" came from, it
just appeared out of the blue in that step. Thanks!
See https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201047
Reported-by: Troy Engel <troyengel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
The intended text was hidden elsewhere in the source of the
page as a comment.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201029
Reported-by: Mike Weilgart <mike.weilgart@verticalsysadmin.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
In particular, it is possible to write "threaded" to a
cgroup.type file if the current type is "domain threaded".
Previously, the text had implied that this was not possible.
Verified by experiment on Linux 4.15 and 4.19-rc.
Reported-by: Leah Hanson <lhanson@pivotal.io>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
After clone(CLONE_NEWPID), /proc/PID/ns/pid_for_children is empty
until the first child is created. Verified by experiment.
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
There is not an acceptable reason to use these functions ever in
new code. For example, just observe the implementation of the
KDF:
/*
* Turn password into DES key
*/
void
passwd2des_internal (char *pw, char *key)
{
int i;
memset (key, 0, 8);
for (i = 0; *pw && i < 8; ++i)
key[i] ^= *pw++ << 1;
des_setparity (key);
}
This kind of nonsense isn't okay in the year 2017. Therefore, we
enlighten our poor users.
[Note from mtk: I think Jason knows that of which he talks.]
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
The kernel doesn't allow unsharing a pid NS if it has previously been
unshared, per this check in copy_pid_ns:
if (task_active_pid_ns(current) != old_ns)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
so let's note that.
Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Michael Kerrisk