man-pages/man2/fcntl.2

890 lines
26 KiB
Groff
Raw Normal View History

2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
'\" t
.\" Hey Emacs! This file is -*- nroff -*- source.
.\"
.\" This manpage is Copyright (C) 1992 Drew Eckhardt;
.\" 1993 Michael Haardt, Ian Jackson;
.\" 1998 Jamie Lokier;
.\" 2002 Michael Kerrisk.
.\"
.\" Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this
.\" manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are
.\" preserved on all copies.
.\"
.\" Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this
.\" manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided that the
.\" entire resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a
.\" permission notice identical to this one.
.\"
.\" Since the Linux kernel and libraries are constantly changing, this
.\" manual page may be incorrect or out-of-date. The author(s) assume no
.\" responsibility for errors or omissions, or for damages resulting from
.\" the use of the information contained herein. The author(s) may not
.\" have taken the same level of care in the production of this manual,
.\" which is licensed free of charge, as they might when working
.\" professionally.
.\"
.\" Formatted or processed versions of this manual, if unaccompanied by
.\" the source, must acknowledge the copyright and authors of this work.
.\"
.\" Modified 1993-07-24 by Rik Faith <faith@cs.unc.edu>
.\" Modified 1995-09-26 by Andries Brouwer <aeb@cwi.nl>
.\" and again on 960413 and 980804 and 981223.
.\" Modified 1998-12-11 by Jamie Lokier <jamie@imbolc.ucc.ie>
.\" Applied correction by Christian Ehrhardt - aeb, 990712
.\" Modified 2002-04-23 by Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net>
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.\" Added note on F_SETFL and O_DIRECT
.\" Complete rewrite + expansion of material on file locking
.\" Incorporated description of F_NOTIFY, drawing on
.\" Stephen Rothwell's notes in Documentation/dnotify.txt.
.\" Added description of F_SETLEASE and F_GETLEASE
.\" Corrected and polished, aeb, 020527.
.\" Modified 2004-03-03 by Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net>
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.\" Modified description of file leases: fixed some errors of detail
.\" Replaced the term "lease contestant" by "lease breaker"
.\" Modified, 27 May 2004, Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net>
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.\" Added notes on capability requirements
.\" Modified 2004-12-08, added O_NOATIME after note from Martin Pool
[Further notes on that F_GETOWN bug] Hi Andries, [Just for my own reference, I reinclude the pointer to Philippe Troin's patch http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=108380640603164&w=2 ] > > > Except of course for fcntl(fd, F_GETOWN) where the owner is a > > > (negative) process group... If the owning process group has a "low > > > enough" PGID, it collides with errors and glibc reports an error and > > > sets errno to -PGID. One might argue that in this instance, that the > > > BSD's overloading of the pid field with pgids is at fault, but the > > > bug > > > still remains :-) > > > > I believe that practically speaking this is a non-issue. The > > lowest PID / PGID that can be allocated to a process other than > > init or a kernel thread is 300. (RESERVED_PID in kernel/pid.c > > in 2.6, details differ, but same limit in <= 2.4.) > > Hmm. RESERVED_PIDS is used as starting value after overflow, > not as a starting value at the beginning. I think you are mistaken. Hmm -- yes. And I was in any case assuming the notion of a process that might do an F_SETOWN assigning its own PGID to the socket -- but that might not be so. And I was overlooking a comment in the fs/fcntl.c sources that reiterates the point: case F_GETOWN: /* * XXX If f_owner is a process group, the * negative return value will get converted * into an error. Oops. If we keep the * current syscall conventions, the only way * to fix this will be in libc. */ err = filp->f_owner.pid; force_successful_syscall_return(); break; And now I've actually created the error in userland code. It seems that whenever the -PGID retrieved by F_GETOWN is smaller than 4096, then it is interpreted as an error. Now I see the relevant code in sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/sysdep.h: == /* Linux uses a negative return value to indicate syscall errors, unlike most Unices, which use the condition codes' carry flag. Since version 2.1 the return value of a system call might be negative even if the call succeeded. E.g., the `lseek' system call might return a large offset. Therefore we must not anymore test for < 0, but test for a real error by making sure the value in %eax is a real error number. Linus said he will make sure the no syscall returns a value in -1 .. -4095 as a valid result so we can savely test with -4095. */ [...] DO_CALL (syscall_name, args); cmpl $-4095, %eax; jae SYSCALL_ERROR_LABEL; == Ugh.
2004-12-10 16:28:25 +00:00
.\" 2004-12-10, mtk, noted F_GETOWN bug after suggestion from aeb.
.\" 2005-04-08 Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, mtk
.\" Described behaviour of F_SETOWN/F_SETSIG in
.\" multi-threaded processes, and generally cleaned
.\" up the discussion of F_SETOWN.
Noted F_SETOWN bug for socket file descriptor in Linux 2.4 and earlier. Added text on permissions required to send signal to owner. ==== Hello Johannes, > Betreff: Inaccuracy of fcntl man page > Datum: Mon, 2 May 2005 20:07:12 +0200 Thanks for yor note. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I needed to find time to set aside to look at the details. Now I've finally got there. > I have attached a simple program Thanks -- a little program is always helpful. > that uses the fcntl system call in order > to kill an arbitrary process of the same user. > According to the fcntl man page, fcntl(fd,F_SETOWN,pid) returns zero if > it has success. Yes. > If you strace the program while killing for exampe man running in another > terminal, you will see that man is killed, but fcntl(fd,F_SETOWN,pid) > will return EPERM, I confirm that I see this problem in 2.4, with both Unix domain and Internet domain sockets. > where you can only find a very confusing explanation > in the fcntl man page. I'm not sure what explanation you mean here. As far as I can tell, the manual page just doesn't cover this point. > I have looked into the kernel source of 2.4.30 and found out, that > net/core/socket::sock_no_fcntl is the culprit if you use fcntl on Unix > sockets. Yes, looks that way to me, as well, And the 2.2 code looks similar. > If pid is not your own pid or not your own process group, > the system call will return EPERM but will also set the pid > as you wanted to. Yes. > In the 2.6 kernel line, fcntl will react according the specification in > the manual page. Yes. > If you also think, that one should clarify the return specification of > fcntl(fd,F_SETOWN,pid) or 2.4.x kernels, please tell me and I will > provide you with a patch for the manual page. In fact I've written some new text under BUGS, which describes the problem: In Linux 2.4 and earlier, there is bug that can occur when an unprivileged process uses F_SETOWN to specify the owner of a socket file descriptor as a process (group) other than the caller. In this case, fcntl() can return -1 with errno set to EPERM, even when the owner process (group) is one that the caller has permission to send signals to. Despite this error return, the file descriptor owner is set, and signals will be sent to the owner. Does that seem okay to you? > Furthermore, it would be interseting to write there, what permissions > one need in order to send signals to processes via fcntl Good idea. I added the following new text: Sending a signal to the owner process (group) specified by F_SETOWN is subject to the same permissions checks as are described for kill(2), where the sending process is the one that employs F_SETOWN (but see BUGS below). ==== #define _GNU_SOURCE /* needed to get the defines */ #include <fcntl.h> /* in glibc 2.2 this has the needed values defined */ #include <signal.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <sys/un.h> /** * Funnykill kills a program with fcntl **/ int main (int argc, char **argv) { if (argc != 2) { fprintf (stderr, "Usage: funnykill <pid>\n"); return 1; } int sockets[2]; socketpair (AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sockets); if (fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETFL, O_ASYNC | O_NONBLOCK) == -1) errMsg("fcntl-F_SETFL"); if (fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETOWN, atoi (argv[1])) == -1) errMsg("fcntl-F_SETOWN"); // fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETOWN, getpid()); if (fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETSIG, SIGKILL) == -1) errMsg("fcntl-_FSETSIG"); write (sockets[1], "good bye", 9); }
2005-05-20 12:11:25 +00:00
.\" 2005-05-20, Johannes Nicolai <johannes.nicolai@hpi.uni-potsdam.de>,
.\" mtk: Noted F_SETOWN bug for socket file descriptor in Linux 2.4
.\" and earlier. Added text on permissions required to send signal.
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.\"
.TH FCNTL 2 2004-12-08 "Linux 2.6.9" "Linux Programmer's Manual"
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.SH NAME
fcntl \- manipulate file descriptor
.SH SYNOPSIS
.nf
.B #include <unistd.h>
.B #include <fcntl.h>
.sp
.BI "int fcntl(int " fd ", int " cmd );
.BI "int fcntl(int " fd ", int " cmd ", long " arg );
.BI "int fcntl(int " fd ", int " cmd ", struct flock *" lock );
.fi
.SH DESCRIPTION
.BR fcntl ()
performs one of the operations described below on the open file descriptor
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.IR fd .
The operation is determined by
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.IR cmd .
2005-06-24 10:53:06 +00:00
.P
.SS "Duplicating a file descriptor"
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.TP
.B F_DUPFD
Find the lowest numbered available file descriptor
greater than or equal to
.I arg
and make it be a copy of
.IR fd .
This is different from
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.BR dup2 (2)
which uses exactly the descriptor specified.
.sp
On success, the new descriptor is returned.
.sp
See
.BR dup (2)
for further details.
2005-06-24 10:53:06 +00:00
.P
2005-06-22 10:59:21 +00:00
.SS "File descriptor flags"
The following commands manipulate the flags associated with
a file descriptor.
Currently, only one such flag is defined:
.BR FD_CLOEXEC ,
the close-on-exec flag.
If the
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.B FD_CLOEXEC
bit is 0, the file descriptor will remain open across an
.BR execve (2),
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
otherwise it will be closed.
.TP
.B F_GETFD
Read the file descriptor flags.
.TP
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.B F_SETFD
Set the file descriptor flags to the value specified by
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.IR arg .
2005-06-24 10:53:06 +00:00
.P
2005-06-22 10:59:21 +00:00
.SS "File status flags"
Each open file description has certain associated flags, initialized by
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.BR open (2)
.\" or
.\" .BR creat (2),
and possibly modified by
.BR fcntl (2).
Duplicated file descriptors
(made with
.BR dup (),
.BR fcntl (F_DUPFD),
.BR fork (),
etc.) refer to the same open file description, and thus
share the same file status flags.
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.sp
The file status flags and their semantics are described in
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.BR open (2).
.TP
.B F_GETFL
Read the file status flags.
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.TP
.B F_SETFL
Set the file status flags to the value specified by
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.IR arg .
File access mode
.RB ( O_RDONLY ", " O_WRONLY ", " O_RDWR )
and file creation flags
.RB ( O_CREAT ", " O_EXCL ", " O_NOCTTY ", " O_TRUNC )
in
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.I arg
are ignored.
On Linux this command can only change the
.BR O_APPEND ,
.BR O_ASYNC ,
.BR O_DIRECT ,
.BR O_NOATIME ,
and
.BR O_NONBLOCK
flags.
.\" FIXME But according to SUSv3, O_SYNC should also be modifiable via
.\" fcntl(2) -- MTK, Dec 04
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.P
.SS "Advisory locking"
.BR F_GETLK ", " F_SETLK " and " F_SETLKW
are used to acquire, release, and test for the existence of record
locks (also known as file-segment or file-region locks).
The third argument
.I lock
is a pointer to a structure that has at least the following fields
(in unspecified order).
.in +2n
.nf
.sp
struct flock {
...
short l_type; /* Type of lock: F_RDLCK,
F_WRLCK, F_UNLCK */
short l_whence; /* How to interpret l_start:
SEEK_SET, SEEK_CUR, SEEK_END */
off_t l_start; /* Starting offset for lock */
off_t l_len; /* Number of bytes to lock */
pid_t l_pid; /* PID of process blocking our lock
(F_GETLK only) */
...
};
.fi
.in -2n
.P
The
.IR l_whence ", " l_start ", and " l_len
fields of this structure specify the range of bytes we wish to lock.
.I l_start
is the starting offset for the lock, and is interpreted
relative to either:
the start of the file (if
.I l_whence
is
.BR SEEK_SET );
the current file offset (if
.I l_whence
is
.BR SEEK_CUR );
or the end of the file (if
.I l_whence
is
.BR SEEK_END ).
In the final two cases,
.I l_start
can be a negative number provided the
offset does not lie before the start of the file.
.I l_len
is a non-negative integer (but see the NOTES below) specifying
the number of bytes to be locked.
Bytes past the end of the file may be locked,
but not bytes before the start of the file.
Specifying 0 for
.I l_len
has the special meaning: lock all bytes starting at the
location specified by
.IR l_whence " and " l_start
through to the end of file, no matter how large the file grows.
.P
The
.I l_type
field can be used to place a read
.RB ( F_RDLCK )
or a write
2004-12-06 13:39:28 +00:00
.RB ( F_WRLCK )
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
lock on a file.
Any number of processes may hold a read lock (shared lock)
on a file region, but only one process may hold a write lock
(exclusive lock). An exclusive lock excludes all other locks,
both shared and exclusive.
A single process can hold only one type of lock on a file region;
if a new lock is applied to an already-locked region,
then the existing lock is converted to the the new lock type.
(Such conversions may involve splitting, shrinking, or coalescing with
an existing lock if the byte range specified by the new lock does not
precisely coincide with the range of the existing lock.)
.TP
.B F_SETLK
Acquire a lock (when
.I l_type
is
.B F_RDLCK
or
.BR F_WRLCK )
or release a lock (when
.I l_type
is
.BR F_UNLCK )
on the bytes specified by the
.IR l_whence ", " l_start ", and " l_len
fields of
.IR lock .
If a conflicting lock is held by another process,
this call returns \-1 and sets
.I errno
to
.B EACCES
or
.BR EAGAIN .
.TP
.B F_SETLKW
As for
.BR F_SETLK ,
but if a conflicting lock is held on the file, then wait for that
lock to be released.
If a signal is caught while waiting, then the call is interrupted
and (after the signal handler has returned)
returns immediately (with return value \-1 and
.I errno
set to
.BR EINTR ).
.TP
.B F_GETLK
On input to this call,
.I lock
describes a lock we would like to place on the file.
If the lock could be placed,
.BR fcntl ()
does not actually place it, but returns
.B F_UNLCK
in the
.I l_type
field of
.I lock
and leaves the other fields of the structure unchanged.
If one or more incompatible locks would prevent
this lock being placed, then
.BR fcntl ()
returns details about one of these locks in the
.IR l_type ", " l_whence ", " l_start ", and " l_len
fields of
.I lock
and sets
.I l_pid
to be the PID of the process holding that lock.
.P
In order to place a read lock,
.I fd
must be open for reading.
In order to place a write lock,
.I fd
must be open for writing.
To place both types of lock, open a file read-write.
.P
As well as being removed by an explicit
.BR F_UNLCK ,
record locks are automatically released when the process
terminates or if it closes
.I any
file descriptor referring to a file on which locks are held.
.\" (Additional file descriptors referring to the same file
.\" may have been obtained by calls to
.\" .BR open "(2), " dup "(2), " dup2 "(2), or " fcntl (2).)
This is bad: it means that a process can lose the locks on
a file like
.I /etc/passwd
or
.I /etc/mtab
when for some reason a library function decides to open, read
and close it.
.P
Record locks are not inherited by a child created via
.BR fork (2),
but are preserved across an
.BR execve (2).
.P
Because of the buffering performed by the
.BR stdio (3)
library, the use of record locking with routines in that package
should be avoided; use
.BR read "(2) and " write (2)
instead.
.P
.SS "Mandatory locking"
(Non-POSIX.)
The above record locks may be either advisory or mandatory,
and are advisory by default.
To make use of mandatory locks, mandatory locking must be enabled
(using the "-o mand" option to
.BR mount (8))
for the file system containing the
file to be locked and enabled on the file itself (by disabling
group execute permission on the file and enabling the set-GID
permission bit).
Advisory locks are not enforced and are useful only between
cooperating processes. Mandatory locks are enforced for all
processes.
.P
.SS "Managing signals"
.BR F_GETOWN ", " F_SETOWN ", " F_GETSIG " and " F_SETSIG
are used to manage I/O availability signals:
.TP
.B F_GETOWN
Get the process ID or process group currently receiving SIGIO
and SIGURG signals for events on file descriptor
.IR fd .
Process IDs are returned as positive values;
process group IDs are returned as negative values (but see BUGS below).
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.TP
.B F_SETOWN
Set the process ID or process group ID that will receive SIGIO
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
and SIGURG signals for events on file descriptor
.IR fd .
A process ID is specified as a positive value;
a process group ID is specified as a negative value.
Noted F_SETOWN bug for socket file descriptor in Linux 2.4 and earlier. Added text on permissions required to send signal to owner. ==== Hello Johannes, > Betreff: Inaccuracy of fcntl man page > Datum: Mon, 2 May 2005 20:07:12 +0200 Thanks for yor note. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I needed to find time to set aside to look at the details. Now I've finally got there. > I have attached a simple program Thanks -- a little program is always helpful. > that uses the fcntl system call in order > to kill an arbitrary process of the same user. > According to the fcntl man page, fcntl(fd,F_SETOWN,pid) returns zero if > it has success. Yes. > If you strace the program while killing for exampe man running in another > terminal, you will see that man is killed, but fcntl(fd,F_SETOWN,pid) > will return EPERM, I confirm that I see this problem in 2.4, with both Unix domain and Internet domain sockets. > where you can only find a very confusing explanation > in the fcntl man page. I'm not sure what explanation you mean here. As far as I can tell, the manual page just doesn't cover this point. > I have looked into the kernel source of 2.4.30 and found out, that > net/core/socket::sock_no_fcntl is the culprit if you use fcntl on Unix > sockets. Yes, looks that way to me, as well, And the 2.2 code looks similar. > If pid is not your own pid or not your own process group, > the system call will return EPERM but will also set the pid > as you wanted to. Yes. > In the 2.6 kernel line, fcntl will react according the specification in > the manual page. Yes. > If you also think, that one should clarify the return specification of > fcntl(fd,F_SETOWN,pid) or 2.4.x kernels, please tell me and I will > provide you with a patch for the manual page. In fact I've written some new text under BUGS, which describes the problem: In Linux 2.4 and earlier, there is bug that can occur when an unprivileged process uses F_SETOWN to specify the owner of a socket file descriptor as a process (group) other than the caller. In this case, fcntl() can return -1 with errno set to EPERM, even when the owner process (group) is one that the caller has permission to send signals to. Despite this error return, the file descriptor owner is set, and signals will be sent to the owner. Does that seem okay to you? > Furthermore, it would be interseting to write there, what permissions > one need in order to send signals to processes via fcntl Good idea. I added the following new text: Sending a signal to the owner process (group) specified by F_SETOWN is subject to the same permissions checks as are described for kill(2), where the sending process is the one that employs F_SETOWN (but see BUGS below). ==== #define _GNU_SOURCE /* needed to get the defines */ #include <fcntl.h> /* in glibc 2.2 this has the needed values defined */ #include <signal.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <sys/un.h> /** * Funnykill kills a program with fcntl **/ int main (int argc, char **argv) { if (argc != 2) { fprintf (stderr, "Usage: funnykill <pid>\n"); return 1; } int sockets[2]; socketpair (AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sockets); if (fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETFL, O_ASYNC | O_NONBLOCK) == -1) errMsg("fcntl-F_SETFL"); if (fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETOWN, atoi (argv[1])) == -1) errMsg("fcntl-F_SETOWN"); // fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETOWN, getpid()); if (fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETSIG, SIGKILL) == -1) errMsg("fcntl-_FSETSIG"); write (sockets[1], "good bye", 9); }
2005-05-20 12:11:25 +00:00
Most commonly, the calling process specifies itself as the owner
(that is,
.I arg
is specified as
.IR getpid ()).
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.\" From glibc.info:
If you set the
.B O_ASYNC
status flag on a file descriptor (either by providing this flag with the
.BR open (2)
.\" FIXME setting O_ASYNC via open() does not seem to be effective -- MTK
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
call, or by using the
.B F_SETFL
command of
.BR fcntl ()),
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
a SIGIO signal is sent whenever input or output becomes possible
on that file descriptor.
.B F_SETSIG
can be used to obtain delivery of a signal other than SIGIO.
Noted F_SETOWN bug for socket file descriptor in Linux 2.4 and earlier. Added text on permissions required to send signal to owner. ==== Hello Johannes, > Betreff: Inaccuracy of fcntl man page > Datum: Mon, 2 May 2005 20:07:12 +0200 Thanks for yor note. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I needed to find time to set aside to look at the details. Now I've finally got there. > I have attached a simple program Thanks -- a little program is always helpful. > that uses the fcntl system call in order > to kill an arbitrary process of the same user. > According to the fcntl man page, fcntl(fd,F_SETOWN,pid) returns zero if > it has success. Yes. > If you strace the program while killing for exampe man running in another > terminal, you will see that man is killed, but fcntl(fd,F_SETOWN,pid) > will return EPERM, I confirm that I see this problem in 2.4, with both Unix domain and Internet domain sockets. > where you can only find a very confusing explanation > in the fcntl man page. I'm not sure what explanation you mean here. As far as I can tell, the manual page just doesn't cover this point. > I have looked into the kernel source of 2.4.30 and found out, that > net/core/socket::sock_no_fcntl is the culprit if you use fcntl on Unix > sockets. Yes, looks that way to me, as well, And the 2.2 code looks similar. > If pid is not your own pid or not your own process group, > the system call will return EPERM but will also set the pid > as you wanted to. Yes. > In the 2.6 kernel line, fcntl will react according the specification in > the manual page. Yes. > If you also think, that one should clarify the return specification of > fcntl(fd,F_SETOWN,pid) or 2.4.x kernels, please tell me and I will > provide you with a patch for the manual page. In fact I've written some new text under BUGS, which describes the problem: In Linux 2.4 and earlier, there is bug that can occur when an unprivileged process uses F_SETOWN to specify the owner of a socket file descriptor as a process (group) other than the caller. In this case, fcntl() can return -1 with errno set to EPERM, even when the owner process (group) is one that the caller has permission to send signals to. Despite this error return, the file descriptor owner is set, and signals will be sent to the owner. Does that seem okay to you? > Furthermore, it would be interseting to write there, what permissions > one need in order to send signals to processes via fcntl Good idea. I added the following new text: Sending a signal to the owner process (group) specified by F_SETOWN is subject to the same permissions checks as are described for kill(2), where the sending process is the one that employs F_SETOWN (but see BUGS below). ==== #define _GNU_SOURCE /* needed to get the defines */ #include <fcntl.h> /* in glibc 2.2 this has the needed values defined */ #include <signal.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <sys/un.h> /** * Funnykill kills a program with fcntl **/ int main (int argc, char **argv) { if (argc != 2) { fprintf (stderr, "Usage: funnykill <pid>\n"); return 1; } int sockets[2]; socketpair (AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sockets); if (fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETFL, O_ASYNC | O_NONBLOCK) == -1) errMsg("fcntl-F_SETFL"); if (fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETOWN, atoi (argv[1])) == -1) errMsg("fcntl-F_SETOWN"); // fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETOWN, getpid()); if (fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETSIG, SIGKILL) == -1) errMsg("fcntl-_FSETSIG"); write (sockets[1], "good bye", 9); }
2005-05-20 12:11:25 +00:00
If this permission check fails, then the signal is
silently discarded.
Sending a signal to the owner process (group) specified by
.B F_SETOWN
is subject to the same permissions checks as are described for
.BR kill (2),
where the sending process is the one that employs
.BR F_SETOWN
(but see BUGS below).
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.sp
If the file descriptor
.I fd
refers to a socket,
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.B F_SETOWN
also selects
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
the recipient of SIGURG signals that are delivered when out-of-band
data arrives on that socket. (SIGURG is sent in any situation where
.BR select (2)
would report the socket as having an "exceptional condition".)
.\" The following appears to be rubbish. It doesn't seem to
.\" be true according to the kernel source, and I can write
.\" a program that gets a terminal-generated SIGIO even though
.\" it is not the foreground process group of the terminal.
.\" -- MTK, 8 Apr 05
.\"
.\" If the file descriptor
.\" .I fd
.\" refers to a terminal device, then SIGIO
.\" signals are sent to the foreground process group of the terminal.
If a non-zero value is given to
.B F_SETSIG
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:00:59 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: mtk-manpages@gmx.net Subject: Update to fcntl(2) man page Hi Michael, I have a correction to the fcntl(2) man page. Under the section for F_SETOWN, which describes how to set the recipient process or group for SIGIO signals, see this paragraph: The process or process group to receive the signal can be selected by using the F_SETOWN command to the fcntl function. If the file descriptor is a socket, this also selects the recip- ient of SIGURG signals that are delivered when out-of-band data arrives on that socket. (SIGURG is sent in any situation where select(2) would report the socket as having an "exceptional con- dition".) If the file descriptor corresponds to a terminal device, then SIGIO signals are sent to the foreground process group of the terminal. I would like to add an additional paragraph: The value given to F_SETOWN has a slightly different meaning when F_SETSIG is used in a multi-threaded process. If a non-zero value is given to F_SETSIG, then a positive value given to F_SETOWN identifies a specific thread within a process, instead of a whole process. The value is a thread id not a process id, so you may need to pass the result of gettid() instead of getpid() to get sensible results when F_SETSIG is used. (Thread ids are different from process ids, although they have the same value for some threads depending on details of the threading library used). Also, this is the first paragraph of the F_SETSIG section: Sets the signal sent when input or output becomes possible. A value of zero means to send the default SIGIO signal. Any other value (including SIGIO) is the signal to send instead, and in this case additional info is available to the signal handler if installed with SA_SIGINFO. I'd like to append another paragraph right after that one: Additionally, passing a non-zero value to F_SETSIG changes the signal recipient from a whole process to a specific thread within a process. The section on F_SETOWN gives more details. Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:58:59 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page [[...]] > I've been trying to follow the kernel source code to verify > the details you describe above. The relevant place is the > 'switch' in fs/fcntl.c::send_sigio_to_task() right? Yes. > Also, for NPTL, perhaps one needs to mention that for the main > thread, gettid() == getpid(), which allows the traditional > use of F_SETSIG / F_SETOWN in programs consisting of a single > thread -- right? Yes, that makes sense. It's also fine for the "main thread" with NPTL, so programs which spawn threads can still use F_SETOWN/F_SETSIG in the main thread using getpid(). Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:25:49 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page Michael Kerrisk wrote: > F_SETOWN > Set the process ID or process group ID that will > receive SIGIO and SIGURG signals for events on > file descriptor fd. A process ID is specified as > a positive value; a process group ID is specified > as a negative value. > > If you set the O_ASYNC status flag on a file > descriptor (either by providing this flag with the > open(2) call, or by using the F_SETFL command of > fcntl), a SIGIO signal is sent whenever input or > output becomes possible on that file descriptor. > F_SETSIG can be used to obtain delivery of a sig&#8208; > nal other than SIGIO. > > If the file descriptor fd refers to a socket, > F_SETOWN also selects the recipient of SIGURG sig&#8208; > nals that are delivered when out-of-band data > arrives on that socket. (SIGURG is sent in any > situation where select(2) would report the socket > as having an "exceptional condition".) > > If a non-zero value is given to F_SETSIG in a > multi-threaded process, then a positive value > value given to F_SETOWN has a different meaning: > instead of being a process ID identifying a whole > process, it is a thread ID identifying a specific > thread within a process. Consequently, it may be > necessary to pass F_SETOWN the result of gettid() > instead of getpid() to get sensible results when > F_SETSIG is used. (In current Linux threading > implementations, a main thread's thread ID is the > same as its process ID. This means that a single- > threaded program can equally use gettid() or get&#8208; > pid() in this scenario.) Note, however, that the > statements in this paragraph do not apply to the > SIGURG signal generated for out-of-band data on a > socket: this signal is always sent to either a > process or a process group, depending on the value > given to F_SETOWN. > > And the first part of the description of F_SETSIG now reads: > > F_SETSIG > Sets the signal sent when input or output becomes > possible. A value of zero means to send the > default SIGIO signal. Any other value (including > SIGIO) is the signal to send instead, and in this > case additional info is available to the signal > handler if installed with SA_SIGINFO. > > Additionally, passing a non-zero value to F_SETSIG > changes the signal recipient from a whole process > to a specific thread within a process. See the > desciption of F_SETOWN for more details. > > Does the above seem okay to you? It looks good, but: 1. An omission: It mentions that SIGURG is always sent to the whole process. SIGIO is also sent to the whole process, instead of queueing a thread-specific signal, when the signal queue is full. Programs that mustn't miss readiness events need to handle it. 2. The description could be confusing to LinuxThreads users, because all the signals are thread-specific in LinuxThreads. Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:53:19 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > 1. An omission: It mentions that SIGURG is always sent to the whole > > process. SIGIO is also sent to the whole process, instead of > > queueing a thread-specific signal, when the signal queue is full. > > Programs that mustn't miss readiness events need to handle it. > > Sorry -- can you point me to the relevant code for the > above point please. In 2.6: switch (fown->signum) { siginfo_t si; default: /* Queue a rt signal with the appropriate fd as its value. We use SI_SIGIO as the source, not SI_KERNEL, since kernel signals always get delivered even if we can't queue. Failure to queue in this case _should_ be reported; we fall back to SIGIO in that case. --sct */ si.si_signo = fown->signum; si.si_errno = 0; si.si_code = reason; /* Make sure we are called with one of the POLL_* reasons, otherwise we could leak kernel stack into userspace. */ if ((reason & __SI_MASK) != __SI_POLL) BUG(); if (reason - POLL_IN >= NSIGPOLL) si.si_band = ~0L; else si.si_band = band_table[reason - POLL_IN]; si.si_fd = fd; if (!send_sig_info(fown->signum, &si, p)) break; /* fall-through: fall back on the old plain SIGIO signal */ case 0: send_group_sig_info(SIGIO, SEND_SIG_PRIV, p); 2.4 is exactly the same, except: /* fall-through: fall back on the old plain SIGIO signal */ case 0: send_sig(SIGIO, p, 1); The fall-through happens when send_sig_info() fails, which happens when the real-time signal queue is full. Programs using a queued signal to track file readiness efficiently (as an alternative to select/poll), must listen for SIGIO in addition to the real-time signal, as otherwise they will miss notifications when the queue is full (which happens often on a busy server). Multi-threaded programs using NPTL must be aware this SIGIO is process-wide - so receiving it on one thread must cause all threads to assume a queued signal may be lost. Programs using LinuxThreads do not have to assume this (but it's safe if they do). Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:25:44 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page Michael Kerrisk wrote: > I added a few more sentences to the end of that paragraph > on F_SETOWN: > > If a non-zero value is given to F_SETSIG in a multi-threaded > process running with a threading library that supports thread > groups (e.g., NPTL), then a positive value value given to > F_SETOWN has a different meaning: instead of being a process ID > identifying a whole process, it is a thread ID identifying a > specific thread within a process. Consequently, it may be nec- > essary to pass F_SETOWN the result of gettid() instead of get > pid() to get sensible results when F_SETSIG is used. (In cur- > rent Linux threading implementations, a main thread's thread ID > is the same as its process ID. This means that a single- > threaded program can equally use gettid() or getpid() in this > scenario.) Note, however, that the statements in this paragraph > do not apply to the SIGURG signal generated for out-of-band data > on a socket: this signal is always sent to either a process or a > process group, depending on the value given to F_SETOWN. Note > also that Linux imposes a limit on the number of real-time sig- > nals that may be queued to a process (see getrlimit(2) and sig- > nal(7)) and if this limit is reached, then the kernel reverts to > delivering SIGIO, and this signal is delivered to the entire > process rather than to a specifc thread. > > Look oay now? Looks ood. It will take a minor genius to translate that to working multi-threaded RT-SIGIO code without a tutorial -- and in fact I haven't heard of any program or library which does it (though I'm trying to write one) -- but technically it seems to include everything.
2005-04-05 05:54:09 +00:00
in a multi-threaded process running with a threading library
that supports thread groups (e.g., NPTL),
then a positive value given to
.B F_SETOWN
has a different meaning:
.\" The relevant place in the (2.6) kernel source is the
.\" 'switch' in fs/fcntl.c::send_sigio_to_task() -- MTK, Apr 2005
instead of being a process ID identifying a whole process,
it is a thread ID identifying a specific thread within a process.
Consequently, it may be necessary to pass
.B F_SETOWN
the result of
.BR gettid ()
instead of
.BR getpid ()
to get sensible results when
.B F_SETSIG
is used.
(In current Linux threading implementations,
a main thread's thread ID is the same as its process ID.
This means that a single-threaded program can equally use
.BR gettid ()
or
.BR getpid ()
in this scenario.)
Note, however, that the statements in this paragraph do not apply
to the SIGURG signal generated for out-of-band data on a socket:
this signal is always sent to either a process or a process group,
depending on the value given to
.BR F_SETOWN .
.\" send_sigurg()/send_sigurg_to_task() bypasses
.\" kill_fasync()/send_sigio()/send_sigio_to_task()
.\" to directly call send_group_sig_info()
.\" -- MTK, Apr 2005 (kernel 2.6.11)
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:00:59 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: mtk-manpages@gmx.net Subject: Update to fcntl(2) man page Hi Michael, I have a correction to the fcntl(2) man page. Under the section for F_SETOWN, which describes how to set the recipient process or group for SIGIO signals, see this paragraph: The process or process group to receive the signal can be selected by using the F_SETOWN command to the fcntl function. If the file descriptor is a socket, this also selects the recip- ient of SIGURG signals that are delivered when out-of-band data arrives on that socket. (SIGURG is sent in any situation where select(2) would report the socket as having an "exceptional con- dition".) If the file descriptor corresponds to a terminal device, then SIGIO signals are sent to the foreground process group of the terminal. I would like to add an additional paragraph: The value given to F_SETOWN has a slightly different meaning when F_SETSIG is used in a multi-threaded process. If a non-zero value is given to F_SETSIG, then a positive value given to F_SETOWN identifies a specific thread within a process, instead of a whole process. The value is a thread id not a process id, so you may need to pass the result of gettid() instead of getpid() to get sensible results when F_SETSIG is used. (Thread ids are different from process ids, although they have the same value for some threads depending on details of the threading library used). Also, this is the first paragraph of the F_SETSIG section: Sets the signal sent when input or output becomes possible. A value of zero means to send the default SIGIO signal. Any other value (including SIGIO) is the signal to send instead, and in this case additional info is available to the signal handler if installed with SA_SIGINFO. I'd like to append another paragraph right after that one: Additionally, passing a non-zero value to F_SETSIG changes the signal recipient from a whole process to a specific thread within a process. The section on F_SETOWN gives more details. Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:58:59 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page [[...]] > I've been trying to follow the kernel source code to verify > the details you describe above. The relevant place is the > 'switch' in fs/fcntl.c::send_sigio_to_task() right? Yes. > Also, for NPTL, perhaps one needs to mention that for the main > thread, gettid() == getpid(), which allows the traditional > use of F_SETSIG / F_SETOWN in programs consisting of a single > thread -- right? Yes, that makes sense. It's also fine for the "main thread" with NPTL, so programs which spawn threads can still use F_SETOWN/F_SETSIG in the main thread using getpid(). Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:25:49 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page Michael Kerrisk wrote: > F_SETOWN > Set the process ID or process group ID that will > receive SIGIO and SIGURG signals for events on > file descriptor fd. A process ID is specified as > a positive value; a process group ID is specified > as a negative value. > > If you set the O_ASYNC status flag on a file > descriptor (either by providing this flag with the > open(2) call, or by using the F_SETFL command of > fcntl), a SIGIO signal is sent whenever input or > output becomes possible on that file descriptor. > F_SETSIG can be used to obtain delivery of a sig&#8208; > nal other than SIGIO. > > If the file descriptor fd refers to a socket, > F_SETOWN also selects the recipient of SIGURG sig&#8208; > nals that are delivered when out-of-band data > arrives on that socket. (SIGURG is sent in any > situation where select(2) would report the socket > as having an "exceptional condition".) > > If a non-zero value is given to F_SETSIG in a > multi-threaded process, then a positive value > value given to F_SETOWN has a different meaning: > instead of being a process ID identifying a whole > process, it is a thread ID identifying a specific > thread within a process. Consequently, it may be > necessary to pass F_SETOWN the result of gettid() > instead of getpid() to get sensible results when > F_SETSIG is used. (In current Linux threading > implementations, a main thread's thread ID is the > same as its process ID. This means that a single- > threaded program can equally use gettid() or get&#8208; > pid() in this scenario.) Note, however, that the > statements in this paragraph do not apply to the > SIGURG signal generated for out-of-band data on a > socket: this signal is always sent to either a > process or a process group, depending on the value > given to F_SETOWN. > > And the first part of the description of F_SETSIG now reads: > > F_SETSIG > Sets the signal sent when input or output becomes > possible. A value of zero means to send the > default SIGIO signal. Any other value (including > SIGIO) is the signal to send instead, and in this > case additional info is available to the signal > handler if installed with SA_SIGINFO. > > Additionally, passing a non-zero value to F_SETSIG > changes the signal recipient from a whole process > to a specific thread within a process. See the > desciption of F_SETOWN for more details. > > Does the above seem okay to you? It looks good, but: 1. An omission: It mentions that SIGURG is always sent to the whole process. SIGIO is also sent to the whole process, instead of queueing a thread-specific signal, when the signal queue is full. Programs that mustn't miss readiness events need to handle it. 2. The description could be confusing to LinuxThreads users, because all the signals are thread-specific in LinuxThreads. Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:53:19 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > 1. An omission: It mentions that SIGURG is always sent to the whole > > process. SIGIO is also sent to the whole process, instead of > > queueing a thread-specific signal, when the signal queue is full. > > Programs that mustn't miss readiness events need to handle it. > > Sorry -- can you point me to the relevant code for the > above point please. In 2.6: switch (fown->signum) { siginfo_t si; default: /* Queue a rt signal with the appropriate fd as its value. We use SI_SIGIO as the source, not SI_KERNEL, since kernel signals always get delivered even if we can't queue. Failure to queue in this case _should_ be reported; we fall back to SIGIO in that case. --sct */ si.si_signo = fown->signum; si.si_errno = 0; si.si_code = reason; /* Make sure we are called with one of the POLL_* reasons, otherwise we could leak kernel stack into userspace. */ if ((reason & __SI_MASK) != __SI_POLL) BUG(); if (reason - POLL_IN >= NSIGPOLL) si.si_band = ~0L; else si.si_band = band_table[reason - POLL_IN]; si.si_fd = fd; if (!send_sig_info(fown->signum, &si, p)) break; /* fall-through: fall back on the old plain SIGIO signal */ case 0: send_group_sig_info(SIGIO, SEND_SIG_PRIV, p); 2.4 is exactly the same, except: /* fall-through: fall back on the old plain SIGIO signal */ case 0: send_sig(SIGIO, p, 1); The fall-through happens when send_sig_info() fails, which happens when the real-time signal queue is full. Programs using a queued signal to track file readiness efficiently (as an alternative to select/poll), must listen for SIGIO in addition to the real-time signal, as otherwise they will miss notifications when the queue is full (which happens often on a busy server). Multi-threaded programs using NPTL must be aware this SIGIO is process-wide - so receiving it on one thread must cause all threads to assume a queued signal may be lost. Programs using LinuxThreads do not have to assume this (but it's safe if they do). Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:25:44 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page Michael Kerrisk wrote: > I added a few more sentences to the end of that paragraph > on F_SETOWN: > > If a non-zero value is given to F_SETSIG in a multi-threaded > process running with a threading library that supports thread > groups (e.g., NPTL), then a positive value value given to > F_SETOWN has a different meaning: instead of being a process ID > identifying a whole process, it is a thread ID identifying a > specific thread within a process. Consequently, it may be nec- > essary to pass F_SETOWN the result of gettid() instead of get > pid() to get sensible results when F_SETSIG is used. (In cur- > rent Linux threading implementations, a main thread's thread ID > is the same as its process ID. This means that a single- > threaded program can equally use gettid() or getpid() in this > scenario.) Note, however, that the statements in this paragraph > do not apply to the SIGURG signal generated for out-of-band data > on a socket: this signal is always sent to either a process or a > process group, depending on the value given to F_SETOWN. Note > also that Linux imposes a limit on the number of real-time sig- > nals that may be queued to a process (see getrlimit(2) and sig- > nal(7)) and if this limit is reached, then the kernel reverts to > delivering SIGIO, and this signal is delivered to the entire > process rather than to a specifc thread. > > Look oay now? Looks ood. It will take a minor genius to translate that to working multi-threaded RT-SIGIO code without a tutorial -- and in fact I haven't heard of any program or library which does it (though I'm trying to write one) -- but technically it seems to include everything.
2005-04-05 05:54:09 +00:00
Note also that Linux imposes a limit on the
number of real-time signals that may be queued to a
process (see
.BR getrlimit (2)
and
.BR signal (7))
and if this limit is reached, then the kernel reverts to
delivering SIGIO, and this signal is delivered to the entire
2005-04-14 09:24:26 +00:00
process rather than to a specific thread.
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:00:59 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: mtk-manpages@gmx.net Subject: Update to fcntl(2) man page Hi Michael, I have a correction to the fcntl(2) man page. Under the section for F_SETOWN, which describes how to set the recipient process or group for SIGIO signals, see this paragraph: The process or process group to receive the signal can be selected by using the F_SETOWN command to the fcntl function. If the file descriptor is a socket, this also selects the recip- ient of SIGURG signals that are delivered when out-of-band data arrives on that socket. (SIGURG is sent in any situation where select(2) would report the socket as having an "exceptional con- dition".) If the file descriptor corresponds to a terminal device, then SIGIO signals are sent to the foreground process group of the terminal. I would like to add an additional paragraph: The value given to F_SETOWN has a slightly different meaning when F_SETSIG is used in a multi-threaded process. If a non-zero value is given to F_SETSIG, then a positive value given to F_SETOWN identifies a specific thread within a process, instead of a whole process. The value is a thread id not a process id, so you may need to pass the result of gettid() instead of getpid() to get sensible results when F_SETSIG is used. (Thread ids are different from process ids, although they have the same value for some threads depending on details of the threading library used). Also, this is the first paragraph of the F_SETSIG section: Sets the signal sent when input or output becomes possible. A value of zero means to send the default SIGIO signal. Any other value (including SIGIO) is the signal to send instead, and in this case additional info is available to the signal handler if installed with SA_SIGINFO. I'd like to append another paragraph right after that one: Additionally, passing a non-zero value to F_SETSIG changes the signal recipient from a whole process to a specific thread within a process. The section on F_SETOWN gives more details. Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:58:59 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page [[...]] > I've been trying to follow the kernel source code to verify > the details you describe above. The relevant place is the > 'switch' in fs/fcntl.c::send_sigio_to_task() right? Yes. > Also, for NPTL, perhaps one needs to mention that for the main > thread, gettid() == getpid(), which allows the traditional > use of F_SETSIG / F_SETOWN in programs consisting of a single > thread -- right? Yes, that makes sense. It's also fine for the "main thread" with NPTL, so programs which spawn threads can still use F_SETOWN/F_SETSIG in the main thread using getpid(). Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:25:49 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page Michael Kerrisk wrote: > F_SETOWN > Set the process ID or process group ID that will > receive SIGIO and SIGURG signals for events on > file descriptor fd. A process ID is specified as > a positive value; a process group ID is specified > as a negative value. > > If you set the O_ASYNC status flag on a file > descriptor (either by providing this flag with the > open(2) call, or by using the F_SETFL command of > fcntl), a SIGIO signal is sent whenever input or > output becomes possible on that file descriptor. > F_SETSIG can be used to obtain delivery of a sig&#8208; > nal other than SIGIO. > > If the file descriptor fd refers to a socket, > F_SETOWN also selects the recipient of SIGURG sig&#8208; > nals that are delivered when out-of-band data > arrives on that socket. (SIGURG is sent in any > situation where select(2) would report the socket > as having an "exceptional condition".) > > If a non-zero value is given to F_SETSIG in a > multi-threaded process, then a positive value > value given to F_SETOWN has a different meaning: > instead of being a process ID identifying a whole > process, it is a thread ID identifying a specific > thread within a process. Consequently, it may be > necessary to pass F_SETOWN the result of gettid() > instead of getpid() to get sensible results when > F_SETSIG is used. (In current Linux threading > implementations, a main thread's thread ID is the > same as its process ID. This means that a single- > threaded program can equally use gettid() or get&#8208; > pid() in this scenario.) Note, however, that the > statements in this paragraph do not apply to the > SIGURG signal generated for out-of-band data on a > socket: this signal is always sent to either a > process or a process group, depending on the value > given to F_SETOWN. > > And the first part of the description of F_SETSIG now reads: > > F_SETSIG > Sets the signal sent when input or output becomes > possible. A value of zero means to send the > default SIGIO signal. Any other value (including > SIGIO) is the signal to send instead, and in this > case additional info is available to the signal > handler if installed with SA_SIGINFO. > > Additionally, passing a non-zero value to F_SETSIG > changes the signal recipient from a whole process > to a specific thread within a process. See the > desciption of F_SETOWN for more details. > > Does the above seem okay to you? It looks good, but: 1. An omission: It mentions that SIGURG is always sent to the whole process. SIGIO is also sent to the whole process, instead of queueing a thread-specific signal, when the signal queue is full. Programs that mustn't miss readiness events need to handle it. 2. The description could be confusing to LinuxThreads users, because all the signals are thread-specific in LinuxThreads. Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:53:19 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > 1. An omission: It mentions that SIGURG is always sent to the whole > > process. SIGIO is also sent to the whole process, instead of > > queueing a thread-specific signal, when the signal queue is full. > > Programs that mustn't miss readiness events need to handle it. > > Sorry -- can you point me to the relevant code for the > above point please. In 2.6: switch (fown->signum) { siginfo_t si; default: /* Queue a rt signal with the appropriate fd as its value. We use SI_SIGIO as the source, not SI_KERNEL, since kernel signals always get delivered even if we can't queue. Failure to queue in this case _should_ be reported; we fall back to SIGIO in that case. --sct */ si.si_signo = fown->signum; si.si_errno = 0; si.si_code = reason; /* Make sure we are called with one of the POLL_* reasons, otherwise we could leak kernel stack into userspace. */ if ((reason & __SI_MASK) != __SI_POLL) BUG(); if (reason - POLL_IN >= NSIGPOLL) si.si_band = ~0L; else si.si_band = band_table[reason - POLL_IN]; si.si_fd = fd; if (!send_sig_info(fown->signum, &si, p)) break; /* fall-through: fall back on the old plain SIGIO signal */ case 0: send_group_sig_info(SIGIO, SEND_SIG_PRIV, p); 2.4 is exactly the same, except: /* fall-through: fall back on the old plain SIGIO signal */ case 0: send_sig(SIGIO, p, 1); The fall-through happens when send_sig_info() fails, which happens when the real-time signal queue is full. Programs using a queued signal to track file readiness efficiently (as an alternative to select/poll), must listen for SIGIO in addition to the real-time signal, as otherwise they will miss notifications when the queue is full (which happens often on a busy server). Multi-threaded programs using NPTL must be aware this SIGIO is process-wide - so receiving it on one thread must cause all threads to assume a queued signal may be lost. Programs using LinuxThreads do not have to assume this (but it's safe if they do). Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:25:44 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page Michael Kerrisk wrote: > I added a few more sentences to the end of that paragraph > on F_SETOWN: > > If a non-zero value is given to F_SETSIG in a multi-threaded > process running with a threading library that supports thread > groups (e.g., NPTL), then a positive value value given to > F_SETOWN has a different meaning: instead of being a process ID > identifying a whole process, it is a thread ID identifying a > specific thread within a process. Consequently, it may be nec- > essary to pass F_SETOWN the result of gettid() instead of get > pid() to get sensible results when F_SETSIG is used. (In cur- > rent Linux threading implementations, a main thread's thread ID > is the same as its process ID. This means that a single- > threaded program can equally use gettid() or getpid() in this > scenario.) Note, however, that the statements in this paragraph > do not apply to the SIGURG signal generated for out-of-band data > on a socket: this signal is always sent to either a process or a > process group, depending on the value given to F_SETOWN. Note > also that Linux imposes a limit on the number of real-time sig- > nals that may be queued to a process (see getrlimit(2) and sig- > nal(7)) and if this limit is reached, then the kernel reverts to > delivering SIGIO, and this signal is delivered to the entire > process rather than to a specifc thread. > > Look oay now? Looks ood. It will take a minor genius to translate that to working multi-threaded RT-SIGIO code without a tutorial -- and in fact I haven't heard of any program or library which does it (though I'm trying to write one) -- but technically it seems to include everything.
2005-04-05 05:54:09 +00:00
.\" See fs/fcntl.c::send_sigio_to_task() (2.4/2.6) sources -- MTK, Apr 05
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.TP
.B F_GETSIG
Get the signal sent when input or output becomes possible. A value of
zero means SIGIO is sent. Any other value (including SIGIO) is the
signal sent instead, and in this case additional info is available to
the signal handler if installed with SA_SIGINFO.
.TP
.B F_SETSIG
Sets the signal sent when input or output becomes possible. A value of
zero means to send the default SIGIO signal. Any other value (including
SIGIO) is the signal to send instead, and in this case additional info
is available to the signal handler if installed with SA_SIGINFO.
.sp
Additionally, passing a non-zero value to
.B F_SETSIG
changes the signal recipient from a whole process to a specific thread
within a process.
2005-04-18 13:35:29 +00:00
See the description of
.B F_SETOWN
for more details.
.sp
By using
.B F_SETSIG
with a non-zero value, and setting SA_SIGINFO for the
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
signal handler (see
.BR sigaction (2)),
extra information about I/O events is passed to
the handler in a
.I siginfo_t
structure.
If the
.I si_code
field indicates the source is SI_SIGIO, the
.I si_fd
field gives the file descriptor associated with the event. Otherwise,
there is no indication which file descriptors are pending, and you
should use the usual mechanisms
.RB ( select (2),
.BR poll (2),
.BR read (2)
with
.B O_NONBLOCK
set etc.) to determine which file descriptors are available for I/O.
.sp
By selecting a POSIX.1b real time signal (value >= SIGRTMIN), multiple
I/O events may be queued using the same signal numbers. (Queuing is
dependent on available memory). Extra information is available
if SA_SIGINFO is set for the signal handler, as above.
.PP
Using these mechanisms, a program can implement fully asynchronous I/O
without using
.BR select (2)
or
.BR poll (2)
most of the time.
.PP
The use of
.BR O_ASYNC ,
.BR F_GETOWN ,
.B F_SETOWN
is specific to BSD and Linux.
.B F_GETSIG
and
.B F_SETSIG
are Linux-specific. POSIX has asynchronous I/O and the
.I aio_sigevent
structure to achieve similar things; these are also available
in Linux as part of the GNU C Library (Glibc).
.P
.SS Leases
.B F_SETLEASE
and
.B F_GETLEASE
(Linux 2.4 onwards) are used (respectively) to establish and
retrieve the current setting of the calling process's lease on
the file referred to by
.IR fd .
A file lease provides a mechanism whereby the process holding
the lease (the "lease holder") is notified (via delivery of a signal)
when another process (the "lease breaker") tries to
.BR open (2)
or
.BR truncate (2)
that file.
.TP
.B F_SETLEASE
Set or remove a file lease according to which of the following
values is specified in the integer
.IR arg :
.RS
.TP
.B F_RDLCK
Take out a read lease.
This will cause us to be notified when
another process opens the file for writing or truncates it.
.TP
.B F_WRLCK
Take out a write lease.
This will cause us to be notified when
another process opens the file (for reading or writing) or truncates it.
A write lease may be placed on a file only if no other process
currently has the file open.
.TP
.B F_UNLCK
Remove our lease from the file.
.RE
.P
A process may hold only one type of lease on a file.
.P
Leases may only be taken out on regular files.
An unprivileged process may only take out a lease on a file whose
UID matches the file system UID of the process.
A process with the
.B CAP_LEASE
capability may take out leases on arbitrary files.
.TP
.B F_GETLEASE
Indicates what type of lease we hold on the file
referred to by
.I fd
by returning either
.BR F_RDLCK ", " F_WRLCK ", or " F_UNLCK,
indicating, respectively, that the calling process holds a
read, a write, or no lease on the file.
(The third argument to
.BR fcntl ()
is omitted.)
.PP
When a process (the "lease breaker") performs an
.BR open ()
or
.BR truncate ()
that conflicts with a lease established via
.BR F_SETLEASE ,
the system call is blocked by the kernel, unless the
.B O_NONBLOCK
flag was specified to
.BR open (),
in which case the system call will return with the error
.BR EWOULDBLOCK .
The kernel notifies the lease holder by sending it a signal
(SIGIO by default).
The lease holder should respond to receipt of this signal by doing
whatever cleanup is required in preparation for the file to be
accessed by another process (e.g., flushing cached buffers) and
then either remove or downgrade its lease.
A lease is removed by performing an
.B F_SETLEASE
command specifying
.I arg
as
.BR F_UNLCK .
If we currently hold a write lease on the file,
and the lease breaker is opening the file for reading,
then it is sufficient to downgrade the lease to a read lease.
This is done by performing an
.B F_SETLEASE
command specifying
.I arg
as
.BR F_RDLCK .
If the lease holder fails to downgrade or remove the lease within
the number of seconds specified in
.I /proc/sys/fs/lease-break-time
then the kernel forcibly removes or downgrades the lease holder's lease.
Once the lease has been voluntarily or forcibly removed or downgraded,
and assuming the lease breaker has not unblocked its system call,
the kernel permits the lease breaker's system call to proceed.
The default signal used to notify the lease holder is SIGIO,
but this can be changed using the
.B F_SETSIG
command to
.B fcntl ().
If a
.B F_SETSIG
command is performed (even one specifying SIGIO), and the signal
handler is established using SA_SIGINFO, then the handler will
receive a
.I siginfo_t
2005-04-18 13:35:29 +00:00
structure as its second argument, and the
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.I si_fd
field of this argument will hold the descriptor of the leased file
that has been accessed by another process.
(This is useful if the caller holds leases against multiple files).
2005-06-24 10:53:06 +00:00
.P
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.SS "File and directory change notification"
2005-06-22 10:56:11 +00:00
.\" FIXME -- Eventually we may want to add a note about inotify
.\" here (MTK, Jun 05)
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.TP
.B F_NOTIFY
(Linux 2.4 onwards)
Provide notification when the directory referred to by
.I fd
or any of the files that it contains is changed.
The events to be notified are specified in
.IR arg ,
which is a bit mask specified by ORing together zero or more of
the following bits:
.TS
l l
----
lB l.
Bit Description (event in directory)
DN_ACCESS A file was accessed (read, pread, readv)
DN_MODIFY A file was modified (write, pwrite,
writev, truncate, ftruncate)
DN_CREATE A file was created (open, creat, mknod,
mkdir, link, symlink, rename)
DN_DELETE A file was unlinked (unlink, rename to
another directory, rmdir)
DN_RENAME A file was renamed within this
directory (rename)
DN_ATTRIB The attributes of a file were changed
(chown, chmod, utime[s])
.TE
.sp
(In order to obtain these definitions, the _GNU_SOURCE macro must be
defined before including <fcntl.h>.)
.sp
Directory notifications are normally "one-shot", and the application
must re-register to receive further notifications.
Alternatively, if
.B DN_MULTISHOT
is included in
.IR arg ,
then notification will remain in effect until explicitly removed.
.\" The following does seem a poor API-design choice...
A series of
.B F_NOTIFY
requests is cumulative, with the events in
.I arg
being added to the set already monitored.
To disable notification of all events, make an
.B F_NOTIFY
call specifying
.I arg
as 0.
.sp
Notification occurs via delivery of a signal.
The default signal is SIGIO, but this can be changed using the
.B F_SETSIG
command to
.BR fcntl ().
In the latter case, the signal handler receives a
.I siginfo_t
structure as its second argument (if the handler was
established using SA_SIGINFO) and the
.I si_fd
field of this structure contains the file descriptor which
generated the notification (useful when establishing notification
on multiple directories).
.sp
Especially when using
.BR DN_MULTISHOT ,
2005-04-18 13:35:29 +00:00
a POSIX.1b real time signal should be used for notification,
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
so that multiple notifications can be queued.
.SH "RETURN VALUE"
For a successful call, the return value depends on the operation:
.TP 0.9i
.B F_DUPFD
The new descriptor.
.TP
.B F_GETFD
2005-06-22 10:59:21 +00:00
Value of flags.
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.TP
.B F_GETFL
Value of flags.
.TP
.B F_GETOWN
Value of descriptor owner.
.TP
.B F_GETSIG
Value of signal sent when read or write becomes possible, or zero
for traditional SIGIO behaviour.
.TP
All other commands
Zero.
.PP
On error, \-1 is returned, and
.I errno
is set appropriately.
.SH ERRORS
.TP
.BR EACCES " or " EAGAIN
Operation is prohibited by locks held by other processes.
Or, operation is prohibited because the file has been memory-mapped by
another process.
.TP
.B EBADF
.I fd
is not an open file descriptor, or the command was
.B F_SETLK
or
.B F_SETLKW
and the file descriptor open mode doesn't match with the
type of lock requested.
.TP
.B EDEADLK
It was detected that the specified
.B F_SETLKW
command would cause a deadlock.
.TP
.B EFAULT
.I lock
is outside your accessible address space.
.TP
.B EINTR
For
.BR F_SETLKW ,
the command was interrupted by a signal.
For
.BR F_GETLK " and " F_SETLK ,
the command was interrupted by a signal before the lock was checked or
acquired. Most likely when locking a remote file (e.g. locking over
NFS), but can sometimes happen locally.
.TP
.B EINVAL
For
.BR F_DUPFD ,
.I arg
is negative or is greater than the maximum allowable value. For
.BR F_SETSIG ,
.I arg
is not an allowable signal number.
.TP
.B EMFILE
For
.BR F_DUPFD ,
the process already has the maximum number of file descriptors open.
.TP
.B ENOLCK
Too many segment locks open, lock table is full, or a remote locking
protocol failed (e.g. locking over NFS).
.TP
.B EPERM
Attempted to clear the
.B O_APPEND
flag on a file that has the append-only attribute set.
.SH NOTES
The errors returned by
.BR dup2 ()
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
are different from those returned by
.BR F_DUPFD .
Since kernel 2.0, there is no interaction between the types of lock
placed by
.BR flock (2)
and
.BR fcntl (2).
POSIX 1003.1-2001 allows
.I l_len
to be negative. (And if it is, the interval described by the lock
covers bytes
.IR l_start + l_len
up to and including
2005-06-15 14:10:23 +00:00
.IR l_start \-1.)
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
This is supported by Linux since Linux 2.4.21 and 2.5.49.
Several systems have more fields in
.I "struct flock"
such as e.g.
.IR l_sysid .
Clearly,
.I l_pid
alone is not going to be very useful if the process holding the lock
may live on a different machine.
.SH BUGS
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:09:43 +0100 (MET) From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> To: Andries Brouwer <Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl> Subject: Re: errno Hi Andries, > On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 05:07:36PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > > I added this text to fcntl.2: > > > > BUGS > > A limitation of the Linux system call conventions means that > > if a (negative) process group ID to be returned by F_GETOWN > > falls in the range -1 to -4095, then the return value is > > wrongly interpreted by glibc as an error in the system call; > > that is, the return value of fcntl() will be -1, and errno > > will contain the (positive) process group ID. > > Yes. > > (Maybe glibc always did this, early libc considered any negative > return value an error. On the other hand, not all the world is an i386 - > IBM has just decided that we don't need any i386's anymore > and sold their stuff to the Chinese - we must use PPC, as Linus > does already - and on other architectures we do not have this > ugliness, I think.) > > You might consider adding "i386" somewhere: > A limitation of the Linux i386 system call conventions ... Some testing on ia64 (RedHat EL 3.0, 2.4.21) and alpha (2.4.18, Debian 3.0) showed that any negative PGID value causes F_GETOWN to fail. My limited reading of the ia64 source: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/sysdep.h shows that there is a comment about the -4095 value there, but that doesn't seem to reflect the reality of the code. Reading the source, the -4095 limit seems to hold on some other architectures, e.g.: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-32/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-64/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sysdep.h Unfortunately, I have no non-x86 systems other than the above alpha and ia64 (HP-testdrive) on which I can test. I modified the text a little: BUGS A limitation of the Linux system call conventions on some architectures (notably x86) means that if a (negative) pro&#8208; cess group ID to be returned by F_GETOWN falls in the range -1 to -4095, then the return value is wrongly interpreted by glibc as an error in the system call; that is, the return value of fcntl() will be -1, and errno will contain the (positive) process group ID. I've left a FIXME in the man page source noting that details have yet to be sorted out for ia64, alpha, etc.
2004-12-13 11:32:37 +00:00
A limitation of the Linux system call conventions on some
architectures (notably x86) means that if a (negative)
process group ID to be returned by
.B F_GETOWN
2005-06-15 14:10:23 +00:00
falls in the range \-1 to \-4095, then the return value is wrongly
interpreted by glibc as an error in the system call;
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:09:43 +0100 (MET) From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> To: Andries Brouwer <Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl> Subject: Re: errno Hi Andries, > On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 05:07:36PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > > I added this text to fcntl.2: > > > > BUGS > > A limitation of the Linux system call conventions means that > > if a (negative) process group ID to be returned by F_GETOWN > > falls in the range -1 to -4095, then the return value is > > wrongly interpreted by glibc as an error in the system call; > > that is, the return value of fcntl() will be -1, and errno > > will contain the (positive) process group ID. > > Yes. > > (Maybe glibc always did this, early libc considered any negative > return value an error. On the other hand, not all the world is an i386 - > IBM has just decided that we don't need any i386's anymore > and sold their stuff to the Chinese - we must use PPC, as Linus > does already - and on other architectures we do not have this > ugliness, I think.) > > You might consider adding "i386" somewhere: > A limitation of the Linux i386 system call conventions ... Some testing on ia64 (RedHat EL 3.0, 2.4.21) and alpha (2.4.18, Debian 3.0) showed that any negative PGID value causes F_GETOWN to fail. My limited reading of the ia64 source: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/sysdep.h shows that there is a comment about the -4095 value there, but that doesn't seem to reflect the reality of the code. Reading the source, the -4095 limit seems to hold on some other architectures, e.g.: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-32/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-64/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sysdep.h Unfortunately, I have no non-x86 systems other than the above alpha and ia64 (HP-testdrive) on which I can test. I modified the text a little: BUGS A limitation of the Linux system call conventions on some architectures (notably x86) means that if a (negative) pro&#8208; cess group ID to be returned by F_GETOWN falls in the range -1 to -4095, then the return value is wrongly interpreted by glibc as an error in the system call; that is, the return value of fcntl() will be -1, and errno will contain the (positive) process group ID. I've left a FIXME in the man page source noting that details have yet to be sorted out for ia64, alpha, etc.
2004-12-13 11:32:37 +00:00
.\" glibc source: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/sysdep.h
that is, the return value of
.BR fcntl ()
will be \-1, and
.I errno
will contain the (positive) process group ID.
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:09:43 +0100 (MET) From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> To: Andries Brouwer <Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl> Subject: Re: errno Hi Andries, > On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 05:07:36PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > > I added this text to fcntl.2: > > > > BUGS > > A limitation of the Linux system call conventions means that > > if a (negative) process group ID to be returned by F_GETOWN > > falls in the range -1 to -4095, then the return value is > > wrongly interpreted by glibc as an error in the system call; > > that is, the return value of fcntl() will be -1, and errno > > will contain the (positive) process group ID. > > Yes. > > (Maybe glibc always did this, early libc considered any negative > return value an error. On the other hand, not all the world is an i386 - > IBM has just decided that we don't need any i386's anymore > and sold their stuff to the Chinese - we must use PPC, as Linus > does already - and on other architectures we do not have this > ugliness, I think.) > > You might consider adding "i386" somewhere: > A limitation of the Linux i386 system call conventions ... Some testing on ia64 (RedHat EL 3.0, 2.4.21) and alpha (2.4.18, Debian 3.0) showed that any negative PGID value causes F_GETOWN to fail. My limited reading of the ia64 source: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/sysdep.h shows that there is a comment about the -4095 value there, but that doesn't seem to reflect the reality of the code. Reading the source, the -4095 limit seems to hold on some other architectures, e.g.: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-32/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-64/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sysdep.h Unfortunately, I have no non-x86 systems other than the above alpha and ia64 (HP-testdrive) on which I can test. I modified the text a little: BUGS A limitation of the Linux system call conventions on some architectures (notably x86) means that if a (negative) pro&#8208; cess group ID to be returned by F_GETOWN falls in the range -1 to -4095, then the return value is wrongly interpreted by glibc as an error in the system call; that is, the return value of fcntl() will be -1, and errno will contain the (positive) process group ID. I've left a FIXME in the man page source noting that details have yet to be sorted out for ia64, alpha, etc.
2004-12-13 11:32:37 +00:00
.\" FIXME Dec 04: some limited testing on alpha and ia64 seems to
.\" indicate that ANY negative PGID value will cause F_GETOWN
2005-04-18 13:35:29 +00:00
.\" to misinterpret the return as an error. Some other architectures
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:09:43 +0100 (MET) From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> To: Andries Brouwer <Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl> Subject: Re: errno Hi Andries, > On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 05:07:36PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > > I added this text to fcntl.2: > > > > BUGS > > A limitation of the Linux system call conventions means that > > if a (negative) process group ID to be returned by F_GETOWN > > falls in the range -1 to -4095, then the return value is > > wrongly interpreted by glibc as an error in the system call; > > that is, the return value of fcntl() will be -1, and errno > > will contain the (positive) process group ID. > > Yes. > > (Maybe glibc always did this, early libc considered any negative > return value an error. On the other hand, not all the world is an i386 - > IBM has just decided that we don't need any i386's anymore > and sold their stuff to the Chinese - we must use PPC, as Linus > does already - and on other architectures we do not have this > ugliness, I think.) > > You might consider adding "i386" somewhere: > A limitation of the Linux i386 system call conventions ... Some testing on ia64 (RedHat EL 3.0, 2.4.21) and alpha (2.4.18, Debian 3.0) showed that any negative PGID value causes F_GETOWN to fail. My limited reading of the ia64 source: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/sysdep.h shows that there is a comment about the -4095 value there, but that doesn't seem to reflect the reality of the code. Reading the source, the -4095 limit seems to hold on some other architectures, e.g.: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-32/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-64/sysdep.h sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sysdep.h Unfortunately, I have no non-x86 systems other than the above alpha and ia64 (HP-testdrive) on which I can test. I modified the text a little: BUGS A limitation of the Linux system call conventions on some architectures (notably x86) means that if a (negative) pro&#8208; cess group ID to be returned by F_GETOWN falls in the range -1 to -4095, then the return value is wrongly interpreted by glibc as an error in the system call; that is, the return value of fcntl() will be -1, and errno will contain the (positive) process group ID. I've left a FIXME in the man page source noting that details have yet to be sorted out for ia64, alpha, etc.
2004-12-13 11:32:37 +00:00
.\" seem to have the same range check as x86. -- MTK
Noted F_SETOWN bug for socket file descriptor in Linux 2.4 and earlier. Added text on permissions required to send signal to owner. ==== Hello Johannes, > Betreff: Inaccuracy of fcntl man page > Datum: Mon, 2 May 2005 20:07:12 +0200 Thanks for yor note. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I needed to find time to set aside to look at the details. Now I've finally got there. > I have attached a simple program Thanks -- a little program is always helpful. > that uses the fcntl system call in order > to kill an arbitrary process of the same user. > According to the fcntl man page, fcntl(fd,F_SETOWN,pid) returns zero if > it has success. Yes. > If you strace the program while killing for exampe man running in another > terminal, you will see that man is killed, but fcntl(fd,F_SETOWN,pid) > will return EPERM, I confirm that I see this problem in 2.4, with both Unix domain and Internet domain sockets. > where you can only find a very confusing explanation > in the fcntl man page. I'm not sure what explanation you mean here. As far as I can tell, the manual page just doesn't cover this point. > I have looked into the kernel source of 2.4.30 and found out, that > net/core/socket::sock_no_fcntl is the culprit if you use fcntl on Unix > sockets. Yes, looks that way to me, as well, And the 2.2 code looks similar. > If pid is not your own pid or not your own process group, > the system call will return EPERM but will also set the pid > as you wanted to. Yes. > In the 2.6 kernel line, fcntl will react according the specification in > the manual page. Yes. > If you also think, that one should clarify the return specification of > fcntl(fd,F_SETOWN,pid) or 2.4.x kernels, please tell me and I will > provide you with a patch for the manual page. In fact I've written some new text under BUGS, which describes the problem: In Linux 2.4 and earlier, there is bug that can occur when an unprivileged process uses F_SETOWN to specify the owner of a socket file descriptor as a process (group) other than the caller. In this case, fcntl() can return -1 with errno set to EPERM, even when the owner process (group) is one that the caller has permission to send signals to. Despite this error return, the file descriptor owner is set, and signals will be sent to the owner. Does that seem okay to you? > Furthermore, it would be interseting to write there, what permissions > one need in order to send signals to processes via fcntl Good idea. I added the following new text: Sending a signal to the owner process (group) specified by F_SETOWN is subject to the same permissions checks as are described for kill(2), where the sending process is the one that employs F_SETOWN (but see BUGS below). ==== #define _GNU_SOURCE /* needed to get the defines */ #include <fcntl.h> /* in glibc 2.2 this has the needed values defined */ #include <signal.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <sys/un.h> /** * Funnykill kills a program with fcntl **/ int main (int argc, char **argv) { if (argc != 2) { fprintf (stderr, "Usage: funnykill <pid>\n"); return 1; } int sockets[2]; socketpair (AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sockets); if (fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETFL, O_ASYNC | O_NONBLOCK) == -1) errMsg("fcntl-F_SETFL"); if (fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETOWN, atoi (argv[1])) == -1) errMsg("fcntl-F_SETOWN"); // fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETOWN, getpid()); if (fcntl (sockets[0], F_SETSIG, SIGKILL) == -1) errMsg("fcntl-_FSETSIG"); write (sockets[1], "good bye", 9); }
2005-05-20 12:11:25 +00:00
In Linux 2.4 and earlier, there is bug that can occur
when an unprivileged process uses
.B F_SETOWN
to specify the owner
of a socket file descriptor
as a process (group) other than the caller.
In this case,
.BR fcntl ()
can return \-1 with
.I errno
set to
.BR EPERM ,
even when the owner process (group) is one that the caller
has permission to send signals to.
Despite this error return, the file descriptor owner is set,
and signals will be sent to the owner.
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
.SH "CONFORMING TO"
SVr4, SVID, POSIX, X/OPEN, BSD 4.3. Only the operations F_DUPFD,
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:00:59 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: mtk-manpages@gmx.net Subject: Update to fcntl(2) man page Hi Michael, I have a correction to the fcntl(2) man page. Under the section for F_SETOWN, which describes how to set the recipient process or group for SIGIO signals, see this paragraph: The process or process group to receive the signal can be selected by using the F_SETOWN command to the fcntl function. If the file descriptor is a socket, this also selects the recip- ient of SIGURG signals that are delivered when out-of-band data arrives on that socket. (SIGURG is sent in any situation where select(2) would report the socket as having an "exceptional con- dition".) If the file descriptor corresponds to a terminal device, then SIGIO signals are sent to the foreground process group of the terminal. I would like to add an additional paragraph: The value given to F_SETOWN has a slightly different meaning when F_SETSIG is used in a multi-threaded process. If a non-zero value is given to F_SETSIG, then a positive value given to F_SETOWN identifies a specific thread within a process, instead of a whole process. The value is a thread id not a process id, so you may need to pass the result of gettid() instead of getpid() to get sensible results when F_SETSIG is used. (Thread ids are different from process ids, although they have the same value for some threads depending on details of the threading library used). Also, this is the first paragraph of the F_SETSIG section: Sets the signal sent when input or output becomes possible. A value of zero means to send the default SIGIO signal. Any other value (including SIGIO) is the signal to send instead, and in this case additional info is available to the signal handler if installed with SA_SIGINFO. I'd like to append another paragraph right after that one: Additionally, passing a non-zero value to F_SETSIG changes the signal recipient from a whole process to a specific thread within a process. The section on F_SETOWN gives more details. Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:58:59 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page [[...]] > I've been trying to follow the kernel source code to verify > the details you describe above. The relevant place is the > 'switch' in fs/fcntl.c::send_sigio_to_task() right? Yes. > Also, for NPTL, perhaps one needs to mention that for the main > thread, gettid() == getpid(), which allows the traditional > use of F_SETSIG / F_SETOWN in programs consisting of a single > thread -- right? Yes, that makes sense. It's also fine for the "main thread" with NPTL, so programs which spawn threads can still use F_SETOWN/F_SETSIG in the main thread using getpid(). Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:25:49 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page Michael Kerrisk wrote: > F_SETOWN > Set the process ID or process group ID that will > receive SIGIO and SIGURG signals for events on > file descriptor fd. A process ID is specified as > a positive value; a process group ID is specified > as a negative value. > > If you set the O_ASYNC status flag on a file > descriptor (either by providing this flag with the > open(2) call, or by using the F_SETFL command of > fcntl), a SIGIO signal is sent whenever input or > output becomes possible on that file descriptor. > F_SETSIG can be used to obtain delivery of a sig&#8208; > nal other than SIGIO. > > If the file descriptor fd refers to a socket, > F_SETOWN also selects the recipient of SIGURG sig&#8208; > nals that are delivered when out-of-band data > arrives on that socket. (SIGURG is sent in any > situation where select(2) would report the socket > as having an "exceptional condition".) > > If a non-zero value is given to F_SETSIG in a > multi-threaded process, then a positive value > value given to F_SETOWN has a different meaning: > instead of being a process ID identifying a whole > process, it is a thread ID identifying a specific > thread within a process. Consequently, it may be > necessary to pass F_SETOWN the result of gettid() > instead of getpid() to get sensible results when > F_SETSIG is used. (In current Linux threading > implementations, a main thread's thread ID is the > same as its process ID. This means that a single- > threaded program can equally use gettid() or get&#8208; > pid() in this scenario.) Note, however, that the > statements in this paragraph do not apply to the > SIGURG signal generated for out-of-band data on a > socket: this signal is always sent to either a > process or a process group, depending on the value > given to F_SETOWN. > > And the first part of the description of F_SETSIG now reads: > > F_SETSIG > Sets the signal sent when input or output becomes > possible. A value of zero means to send the > default SIGIO signal. Any other value (including > SIGIO) is the signal to send instead, and in this > case additional info is available to the signal > handler if installed with SA_SIGINFO. > > Additionally, passing a non-zero value to F_SETSIG > changes the signal recipient from a whole process > to a specific thread within a process. See the > desciption of F_SETOWN for more details. > > Does the above seem okay to you? It looks good, but: 1. An omission: It mentions that SIGURG is always sent to the whole process. SIGIO is also sent to the whole process, instead of queueing a thread-specific signal, when the signal queue is full. Programs that mustn't miss readiness events need to handle it. 2. The description could be confusing to LinuxThreads users, because all the signals are thread-specific in LinuxThreads. Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:53:19 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > 1. An omission: It mentions that SIGURG is always sent to the whole > > process. SIGIO is also sent to the whole process, instead of > > queueing a thread-specific signal, when the signal queue is full. > > Programs that mustn't miss readiness events need to handle it. > > Sorry -- can you point me to the relevant code for the > above point please. In 2.6: switch (fown->signum) { siginfo_t si; default: /* Queue a rt signal with the appropriate fd as its value. We use SI_SIGIO as the source, not SI_KERNEL, since kernel signals always get delivered even if we can't queue. Failure to queue in this case _should_ be reported; we fall back to SIGIO in that case. --sct */ si.si_signo = fown->signum; si.si_errno = 0; si.si_code = reason; /* Make sure we are called with one of the POLL_* reasons, otherwise we could leak kernel stack into userspace. */ if ((reason & __SI_MASK) != __SI_POLL) BUG(); if (reason - POLL_IN >= NSIGPOLL) si.si_band = ~0L; else si.si_band = band_table[reason - POLL_IN]; si.si_fd = fd; if (!send_sig_info(fown->signum, &si, p)) break; /* fall-through: fall back on the old plain SIGIO signal */ case 0: send_group_sig_info(SIGIO, SEND_SIG_PRIV, p); 2.4 is exactly the same, except: /* fall-through: fall back on the old plain SIGIO signal */ case 0: send_sig(SIGIO, p, 1); The fall-through happens when send_sig_info() fails, which happens when the real-time signal queue is full. Programs using a queued signal to track file readiness efficiently (as an alternative to select/poll), must listen for SIGIO in addition to the real-time signal, as otherwise they will miss notifications when the queue is full (which happens often on a busy server). Multi-threaded programs using NPTL must be aware this SIGIO is process-wide - so receiving it on one thread must cause all threads to assume a queued signal may be lost. Programs using LinuxThreads do not have to assume this (but it's safe if they do). Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:25:44 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Update to fcntl(2) man page Michael Kerrisk wrote: > I added a few more sentences to the end of that paragraph > on F_SETOWN: > > If a non-zero value is given to F_SETSIG in a multi-threaded > process running with a threading library that supports thread > groups (e.g., NPTL), then a positive value value given to > F_SETOWN has a different meaning: instead of being a process ID > identifying a whole process, it is a thread ID identifying a > specific thread within a process. Consequently, it may be nec- > essary to pass F_SETOWN the result of gettid() instead of get > pid() to get sensible results when F_SETSIG is used. (In cur- > rent Linux threading implementations, a main thread's thread ID > is the same as its process ID. This means that a single- > threaded program can equally use gettid() or getpid() in this > scenario.) Note, however, that the statements in this paragraph > do not apply to the SIGURG signal generated for out-of-band data > on a socket: this signal is always sent to either a process or a > process group, depending on the value given to F_SETOWN. Note > also that Linux imposes a limit on the number of real-time sig- > nals that may be queued to a process (see getrlimit(2) and sig- > nal(7)) and if this limit is reached, then the kernel reverts to > delivering SIGIO, and this signal is delivered to the entire > process rather than to a specifc thread. > > Look oay now? Looks ood. It will take a minor genius to translate that to working multi-threaded RT-SIGIO code without a tutorial -- and in fact I haven't heard of any program or library which does it (though I'm trying to write one) -- but technically it seems to include everything.
2005-04-05 05:54:09 +00:00
F_GETFD, F_SETFD, F_GETFL, F_SETFL, F_GETLK, F_SETLK, F_SETLKW,
F_GETOWN, and F_SETOWN are specified in POSIX.1.
F_GETSIG, F_SETSIG, F_NOTIFY, F_GETLEASE, and F_SETLEASE
2004-11-03 13:51:07 +00:00
are Linux specific.
(Define the _GNU_SOURCE macro before including <fcntl.h> to
obtain these definitions.)
The flags legal for F_GETFL/F_SETFL are those supported by
.BR open (2)
and vary between these systems; O_APPEND, O_NONBLOCK, O_RDONLY,
and O_RDWR are specified in POSIX.1. SVr4 supports several other
options and flags not documented here.
.PP
SVr4 documents additional EIO, ENOLINK and EOVERFLOW error conditions.
.SH "SEE ALSO"
.BR dup2 (2),
.BR flock (2),
.BR open (2),
.BR socket (2),
.BR lockf (3),
.BR capabilities (7)
.P
See also locks.txt, mandatory.txt, and dnotify.txt in
/usr/src/linux/Documentation.