mirror of https://github.com/tLDP/LDP
updated
This commit is contained in:
parent
894a98697e
commit
b87feaddd4
|
@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
|
|||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
|
||||
<!DOCTYPE book PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN"
|
||||
"http://docbook.org/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd" []>
|
||||
|
||||
<!DOCTYPE book PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN" "file://localhost/usr/share/sgml/docbook/xml-dtd-4.2/docbookx.dtd">
|
||||
<book id="index">
|
||||
<bookinfo>
|
||||
<!-- Use "HOWTO", "mini HOWTO", "FAQ" in title, if appropriate -->
|
||||
|
@ -17,6 +15,12 @@
|
|||
<pubdate>Sep 2003</pubdate>
|
||||
<!-- Most recent revision goes at the top; list in descending order -->
|
||||
<revhistory>
|
||||
<revision>
|
||||
<revnumber>1.2.1</revnumber>
|
||||
<date>2003-09-25</date>
|
||||
<authorinitials>SS</authorinitials>
|
||||
<revremark>yet another bugfix release :( - fix BusID (x:xx.x vs x:xx:x) again</revremark>
|
||||
</revision>
|
||||
<revision>
|
||||
<revnumber>1.2</revnumber>
|
||||
<date>2003-09-17</date>
|
||||
|
@ -756,19 +760,19 @@ EndSection
|
|||
<caution>
|
||||
<para>For the older(version 1) Preferred Bus ID XFree Server only this choice is valid.</para>
|
||||
</caution>
|
||||
<para>For example on command line <screen format="linespecific">[root@svetljo mnt]# startx -- /usr/X11R6/bin/X0 :0 -prefbusid 1:0.0 vt7</screen> , or from a display manager (gdm): <programlisting format="linespecific">..............................
|
||||
<para>For example on command line <screen format="linespecific">[root@svetljo mnt]# startx -- /usr/X11R6/bin/X0 :0 -prefbusid 1:0:0 vt7</screen> , or from a display manager (gdm): <programlisting format="linespecific">..............................
|
||||
# Definition of the standard X server.
|
||||
[server-Standard]
|
||||
name=Standard server
|
||||
command=/usr/X11R6/bin/X0 :0 -layout first-Xserver -deferglyphs 16 -ac -prefbusid 1:0.0 vt7
|
||||
command=/usr/X11R6/bin/X0 :0 -layout first-Xserver -deferglyphs 16 -ac -prefbusid 1:0:0 vt7
|
||||
flexible=true
|
||||
|
||||
[server-Second]
|
||||
name=Second server
|
||||
command=/usr/X11R6/bin/X1 :1 -layout second-Xserver -deferglyphs 16 -prefbusid 0:13.0 vt9
|
||||
command=/usr/X11R6/bin/X1 :1 -layout second-Xserver -deferglyphs 16 -prefbusid 0:13:0 vt9
|
||||
flexible=true
|
||||
.............................. </programlisting> and for xdm/kdm <programlisting format="linespecific">:0 local /bin/nice -n -10 /usr/X11R6/bin/X0 :0 -deferglyphs 16 -prefbusid 1:0.0 vt7
|
||||
:1 local /bin/nice -n -10 /usr/X11R6/bin/X1 :1 -xf86config /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.TNT2 -prefbusid 0:13.0 vt9</programlisting></para>
|
||||
.............................. </programlisting> and for xdm/kdm <programlisting format="linespecific">:0 local /bin/nice -n -10 /usr/X11R6/bin/X0 :0 -deferglyphs 16 -prefbusid 1:0:0 vt7
|
||||
:1 local /bin/nice -n -10 /usr/X11R6/bin/X1 :1 -xf86config /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.TNT2 -prefbusid 0:13:0 vt9</programlisting></para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
@ -805,25 +809,7 @@ ln -s XFree[modified] X2
|
|||
</listitem>
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
<note>
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>For the older(version 1) Preferred Bus ID XFree Server you also have to specify the desired graphic card with parameter <quote><command>-prefbusid x:x:x</command></quote>, where x:x:x is the Bus ID of the desired graphic card.</para>
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>For AGP cards, something similar to <command>-prefbusid 1:0:0</command></para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>For PCI cards, something similar to <command>-prefbusid 0:x:0</command> (x is normally the IRQ number)</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>In the following explanation I will not use this option. If you use the Preferred Bus ID X server just append <command>-prefbusid x:x:x</command> with the correct Bus ID of the card you want to start right before the last argument <command>vt[x]</command> .</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>In case you are using the latest(version 2) prefbusid patch/ binary you may omit the <command moreinfo="none">-prefbusid x:x:x</command> argument when starting X, but you have to specify the correct settings in the XFree configuration file(s).</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
<para>Have in mind that for the older Preferred Bus ID XFree Server (version 1) you have to specify the desired graphic card with parameter <quote><command>-prefbusid x:x:x</command></quote> where x:x:x is the Bus ID of the desired graphic card. Just append "-prefbusid x:x:x" with the correct Bus ID of the card you want to start right before the last argument vt[x].</para>
|
||||
</note>
|
||||
<para>If you have 3 video cards, 3 keyboards, and you have started the Backstreet Ruby kernel with dumbcon=2, you can start 3 independent X servers for 3 simultaneous users with the following commands:</para>
|
||||
<para></para>
|
||||
|
@ -2391,7 +2377,7 @@ your display manager will start a single X server with the corresponding XF86Con
|
|||
</sect1>
|
||||
<sect1 id="dyn_switch_num_x_serv">
|
||||
<title>Dynamically switching the number of X servers</title>
|
||||
<para>There is a very experimental GUI/CLI for dynamically switching the number of running X servers. It uses the automatic configuration of the display managers (mentioned in <xref linkend="automation_multy_snd-cards"/>), Python, dialog for the CLI, and Xdialog for the GUI.</para>
|
||||
<para>There is a very experimental GUI/CLI for dynamically switching the number of running X servers. It uses the automatic configuration of the display managers (mentioned in <xref linkend="auto_dm_confs"/>), Python, dialog for the CLI, and Xdialog for the GUI.</para>
|
||||
<para>Once it is more tested and bug-free, you could, for example, use it under Backstreet Ruby to switch between 2, 3 or more X servers and a single X server using Xinerama. So when your PC isn't used by more then one user, you could use the other monitors under Xinerama. Or one more funny example: you're simulating net gaming with a number of friends on your bruby Linux PC, you have invested a bit more in an additional graphic card which is already configured, but you don't have enough money right now to buy one more monitor and keyboard/mouse pair. One friend of yours comes and says, <quote>Hey guys, that's cool. Can I join?</quote> What would you answer? Using the GUI could result in the following answer from your side: <quote>No problem, just bring your monitor,keyboard and mouse.</quote></para>
|
||||
<para>If you are feeling like a hacker and want to try out this BUGGY GUI/CLI, check the current status at <ulink url="http://varna.demon.co.uk/~svetlio/ruby-contrib/bruby-python/">http://varna.demon.co.uk/~svetlio/ruby-contrib/bruby-python/</ulink>. But remember, it's not very tested, and if not configured properly it can cause you serious troubles. Please wait until it is more stable if you are not that familiar with Linux. If you feel comfortable enough under Linux, and think of yourself as a hacker, please help in testing it and making it better, bug-free and easy to configure.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
<title>Linux User Group HOWTO
|
||||
<author><url name="Rick Moen" url="mailto:rick@linuxmafia.com"></author>
|
||||
<date>v1.6.7, 2003-08-04
|
||||
<date>v1.6.8, 2003-09-27
|
||||
|
||||
<abstract>
|
||||
The Linux User Group HOWTO is a guide to founding, maintaining, and
|
||||
|
@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ The Linux User Group HOWTO is intended to serve as a guide to founding,
|
|||
maintaining, and growing a Linux user group.
|
||||
|
||||
Linux is a freely-distributable implementation of Unix for personal
|
||||
computers, servers, and workstations. It was developed on the i386 and
|
||||
computers, servers, workstations, PDAs, and embedded systems. It was developed on the i386 and
|
||||
now supports i486, Pentium, Pentium Pro, Pentium II, Pentium III, and
|
||||
Pentium IV processors, as well as IA32 clones from AMD, Cyrix, VIA, IDT,
|
||||
Winchip, NexGen, Transmeta, VIA C3 Ezra "CentaurHauls", and others. It
|
||||
|
@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ please: <bf>Free programmers are happy programmers are effective
|
|||
programmers</bf>.
|
||||
|
||||
However, this loose structure can disorient the new Linux user: Whom
|
||||
does she call for support, training, or education? How does she know for
|
||||
what uses Linux is suitable?
|
||||
does she call for support, training, or education? How does she know
|
||||
what Linux is suitable for?
|
||||
|
||||
In large part, LUGs provide the answers, which is why LUGs are
|
||||
vital to the Linux movement: Because your town, village, or metropolis
|
||||
|
@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ they are done by a LUG.
|
|||
|
||||
<sect1>What is a user group?
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Computer user groups, at least in the USA, are not new. In
|
||||
Computer user groups are not new. In
|
||||
fact, they were central to the personal computer's history:
|
||||
Microcomputers arose in large part to satisfy demand for affordable,
|
||||
personal access to computing resources from electronics, ham radio, and
|
||||
|
@ -108,24 +108,22 @@ American user groups in their heyday produced newsletters, maintained
|
|||
shareware and diskette libraries, held meetings and social events, and,
|
||||
sometimes, even ran electronic bulletin board systems (BBSes). With the
|
||||
advent of the Internet, however, many services that user groups once
|
||||
provided migrated to things like CompuServe, AOL, and the Web.
|
||||
provided migrated to things like CompuServe and the Web.
|
||||
|
||||
Linux's rise, however, coincided with and was intensified by the
|
||||
general public "discovering" the Internet. As the Internet grew more
|
||||
popular, so did Linux: The Internet brought to Linux new users,
|
||||
developers, and vendors.
|
||||
developers, and vendors. So, the same force that sent traditional user
|
||||
groups into decline propelled Linux forward and inspired new groups
|
||||
concerned exclusively with it.
|
||||
|
||||
So, just as traditional PC user groups were declining because of the
|
||||
Internet's popularity, this popularity propelled Linux forward, creating
|
||||
demand for new groups concerned exclusively with Linux. To give just one
|
||||
indication of how LUGs differ from traditional user groups, I point out
|
||||
a curious fact: Traditional user groups must maintain fairly tight
|
||||
control over what software its users may copy and trade at meetings.
|
||||
To give just one indication of how LUGs differ from traditional
|
||||
user groups: Traditional groups must closely
|
||||
monitor what software users redistribute at meetings.
|
||||
While illegal copying of restricted proprietary software certainly
|
||||
occurred, it was officially discouraged -- and for good reason.
|
||||
|
||||
occurred, it was officially discouraged -- for good reason.
|
||||
At LUG meetings, however, that entire mindset simply does not apply:
|
||||
Far from being what a LUG must discourage, unrestricted copying of Linux
|
||||
Far from being forbidden, unrestricted copying of Linux
|
||||
should be among a LUG's primary goals. In fact, there is anecdotal
|
||||
evidence of traditional user groups having difficulty adapting to
|
||||
Linux's ability to be lawfully copied at will.
|
||||
|
@ -136,20 +134,19 @@ Check licence terms, if in doubt.)
|
|||
|
||||
<sect1>Summary
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
For the Linux movement to continue to flourish, along with other
|
||||
factors, LUGs must proliferate and succeed. Because of Linux's
|
||||
unique status, LUGs must provide some of the same functions a "regional
|
||||
For the Linux movement to grow, among other requirements,
|
||||
LUGs must proliferate and succeed. Because of Linux's
|
||||
unusual nature, LUGs must provide some of the same functions a "regional
|
||||
office" provides for large computer corporations like IBM, Microsoft,
|
||||
and Sun. LUGs can and must train, support, and educate Linux users,
|
||||
coordinate Linux consultants, advocate Linux as a computing solution,
|
||||
and even serve as liaison to local media outlets such as newspapers and
|
||||
television.
|
||||
and even serve as liaison to local news outlets.
|
||||
|
||||
<sect>What LUGs exist?
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Since this document is meant as a guide not only to maintaining and
|
||||
growing LUGs but also to founding them, we should, before going further,
|
||||
discuss what LUGs exist.
|
||||
discuss what LUGs already exist.
|
||||
|
||||
<sect1>LUG lists
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
|
@ -264,7 +261,7 @@ their advocacy is effective, well-supported, and free.
|
|||
|
||||
<sect1>The limits of advocacy
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Advocacy can be misaimed; advocacy can go wrong and be
|
||||
Advocacy can be mis-aimed; advocacy can go wrong and be
|
||||
counterproductive; advocacy can be simply inappropriate in the first
|
||||
place. The matter merits careful thought, to avoid wasted time or
|
||||
worse.
|
||||
|
@ -283,30 +280,30 @@ receptive.
|
|||
Along those lines, bear in mind that, for many people, perhaps most, an
|
||||
"advocate" is perceived as a salesman, and thus classified as someone to
|
||||
resist rather than listen to fairly. They've never heard of someone
|
||||
being enthusiastic for getting them to adopt a piece of software without
|
||||
standing to gain materially, so they assume there must be something in
|
||||
it for you, and will overtly or unconsciously decide to argue back, and
|
||||
suggest they'd be doing you a personal favour to even listen, let alone
|
||||
urging them to adopt a piece of software without
|
||||
benefiting materially, so they assume there must be something in
|
||||
it for you and will push back, and
|
||||
act as if they're doing you a personal favour to even listen, let alone
|
||||
try your recommendations.
|
||||
|
||||
I recommend bringing such discussions back to a rational basis
|
||||
I recommend bringing such discussions back to Earth
|
||||
immediately, by pointing out that software policy should be based in
|
||||
one's own long-term self interest, that you have no personal stake in
|
||||
what choices they make, and that you certainly wouldn't want to force
|
||||
them to listen to your analyses against their will. After that, if
|
||||
one's own long-term self interest, that you have zero personal stake in
|
||||
their choices, and that you have better uses for your time than speaking
|
||||
to an unreceptive audience. After that, if
|
||||
they're still interested, at least you won't face the same artificial
|
||||
obstacle.
|
||||
|
||||
At the same time, make sure you don't live up to the stereotype of the
|
||||
OS advocate, either. Just shoving your views at someone is downright
|
||||
rude and offensive. Moreover, when done concerning Linux, it's
|
||||
also clueless: Unlike the case with proprietary OSes, Linux will not
|
||||
also pointless: Unlike the case with proprietary OSes, Linux will not
|
||||
live or die by the level of corporate acceptance and release/maintenance
|
||||
of ported applications. It and all key applications are open source:
|
||||
the programmer community that maintains it is self-supporting, and would
|
||||
keep it advancing and and healthy regardless of whether the business
|
||||
world and general public uses it with wild abandon, only a little, or
|
||||
not at all. Because of its open-source licence terms, its raw source
|
||||
not at all. Because of its open-source licence terms, source
|
||||
code is permanently available. Linux cannot be "withdrawn from the
|
||||
market" at the whim of some company. Accordingly, there is simply no
|
||||
point in pesky OS advocacy -- unlike that of some communities we could
|
||||
|
@ -370,7 +367,7 @@ community and social organisations, and other non-corporate
|
|||
environments. This accomplishes the goal of Linux advocacy and also
|
||||
educates the general public. As more such organisations seek Internet
|
||||
presence, provide their personnel dial-in access, or other
|
||||
Linux-relevant funcitons, LUGs gain opportunities for community
|
||||
Linux-relevant functions, LUGs gain opportunities for community
|
||||
participation, through awareness and education efforts -- extending to
|
||||
the community the same generous spirit characteristic of Linux and the
|
||||
free software / open source community from its very beginning. Most
|
||||
|
@ -415,10 +412,10 @@ will have it, too.
|
|||
|
||||
<sect1>Linux support
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Of course, for the desperate <bf>newcomer</bf>, the primary role of a
|
||||
Of course, for the <bf>newcomer</bf>, the primary role of a
|
||||
LUG is Linux support -- but it is a mistake to suppose that Linux
|
||||
support means only <it>technical</it> support for new Linux users. It
|
||||
can and should mean much more.
|
||||
should mean much more.
|
||||
|
||||
LUGs have the opportunity to support:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -431,43 +428,37 @@ LUGs have the opportunity to support:
|
|||
|
||||
<sect2>Users
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
New Linux users' most frequent complaint, once they have gotten Linux
|
||||
installed, is the steep learning curve that is not unique to Linux but
|
||||
is, rather, characteristic of all modern Unixes. With that learning
|
||||
curve, however, comes the power and flexibility of a real operating
|
||||
system. A LUG is often the a new user's only resource to flatten out the
|
||||
learning curve.
|
||||
New Linux users' most frequent complaint, once they have Linux
|
||||
installed, is the steep learning curve characteristic of all modern
|
||||
Unixes. With that learning curve, however, comes the power and
|
||||
flexibility of a real operating system. A LUG is often the a new
|
||||
user's main resource to flatten the learning curve.
|
||||
|
||||
However, even if a new Linux user doesn't yet know it, she needs more
|
||||
than just support: Linux and the free software worlds are both moving
|
||||
targets. LUGs form a valuable source of information on Linux and
|
||||
other free software products. Not only does Linux lack a central
|
||||
bureaucracy, but also for the most part lacks journalistic
|
||||
infrastructure from which other computer systems' users benefit. The
|
||||
movement does have resources like <url name="Linux Journal"
|
||||
During Linux's first decade, it gained some first-class journalistic
|
||||
resources, which should not be neglected: The main monthly magazines
|
||||
of longest standing are <url name="Linux Journal"
|
||||
url="http://www.linuxjournal.com/"> and <url name="Linux Gazette"
|
||||
url="http://www.linuxgazette.com/">, but new users may be unaware of
|
||||
them. In addition, being <it>monthly</it> publications, they're often out
|
||||
of date about bug fixes, security problems, patches, new kernels, etc.
|
||||
This is where LUGs as sources and conduits of timely information can be
|
||||
vital to all Linux users.
|
||||
url="http://www.linuxgazette.com/"> (on-line). More recently, they've
|
||||
been joined by <url name="Linux Format" url="http://www.linuxformat.co.uk/">,
|
||||
<url name="LinuxUser and Developer" url="http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/">,
|
||||
and <url name="Linux Magazine" url="http://linux-magazine.com/">.
|
||||
|
||||
(Fairness requires amending the above old HOWTO text to mention standout
|
||||
on-line news sources with weekly or better publication cycles, such as <url
|
||||
name="Linux Weekly News" url="http://lwn.net/">, <url name="Linux
|
||||
Today" url="http://linuxtoday.com">, <url name="FreshNews"
|
||||
url="http://freshnews.org/">, and <url name="Newsforge"
|
||||
url="http://newsforge.com/">.)
|
||||
Standout on-line magazines with weekly or better publication cycles
|
||||
include <url name="Linux Weekly News" url="http://lwn.net/">,
|
||||
<url name="Linux Today" url="http://linuxtoday.com">,
|
||||
<url name="FreshNews" url="http://freshnews.org/">, and
|
||||
<url name="Newsforge" url="http://newsforge.com/">.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, until new Linux users know that the newest kernels are
|
||||
available from <url name="ftp.kernel.org" url="ftp://ftp.kernel.org">
|
||||
or that the <bf>Linux Documentation Project</bf> usually has newer
|
||||
versions of Linux HOWTOs than does a CD-based Linux distribution,
|
||||
LUGs, as primary support entities, should convey such
|
||||
timely and useful information.
|
||||
All of these resources have eased LUGs' job of spreading essential
|
||||
news and information -- about bug fixes, security problems, patches,
|
||||
new kernels, etc., but new users must still be made aware of
|
||||
them, and taught that the newest kernels are always
|
||||
available from <url name="ftp.kernel.org" url="ftp://ftp.kernel.org">,
|
||||
that the <bf>Linux Documentation Project</bf> has newer
|
||||
versions of Linux HOWTOs than do CD-based Linux distributions,
|
||||
and so on.
|
||||
|
||||
In fact, it may be a bit misleading to focus on the support role
|
||||
LUGs provide new users: intermediate and advanced users
|
||||
Intermediate and advanced users
|
||||
also benefit from proliferation of timely and useful tips, facts,
|
||||
and secrets. Because of the Linux world's manifold aspects, even
|
||||
advanced users often learn new tricks or techniques simply by
|
||||
|
@ -477,31 +468,15 @@ they didn't know existed; sometimes, they just remember arcane
|
|||
|
||||
<sect2>Consultants
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
It is, I think, obvious to claim that LUGs should support new users.
|
||||
After all, if they don't do that, what else is there? It may not be as
|
||||
obvious that LUGs can be an important resource for Linux consultants.
|
||||
Both full-time and otherwise, Linux consultants can be an important part
|
||||
of a LUG. How can the LUG support them?
|
||||
|
||||
The answer is that of a related question: What do Linux consultants
|
||||
need? <bf><it>They need someone for whom to consult.</it></bf> A LUG
|
||||
provides the best way for those <it>offering</it> Linux consulting to
|
||||
find those who <it>need</it> their services. The LUG can informally
|
||||
broker connections between consulting suppliers and consulting
|
||||
consumers, simply by getting people interested in Linux in contact, as
|
||||
will be detailed. The vital point is that LUGs can and should fill
|
||||
<it>this</it> role, as well. Although the Linux Consultants Guide is an
|
||||
important resource, it surely lists only a small fraction of available
|
||||
Linux talent.
|
||||
|
||||
The relationship is mutually beneficial: Consultants aid LUGs by
|
||||
providing experienced leadership, both technically and organisationally,
|
||||
while LUGs aid consultants by putting them in contact with potential
|
||||
clients. New and inexperienced users gain benefit from both LUGs and
|
||||
LUGs can help Linux consultants find their customers and vice-versa,
|
||||
by providing a forum where they can come together.
|
||||
Consultants also aid LUGs by providing experienced leadership.
|
||||
New and inexperienced users gain benefit from both LUGs and
|
||||
consultants, since their routine or simple requests for support are
|
||||
handled by LUGs <it>gratis</it>, and their complex needs and problems --
|
||||
the kind obviously requiring a paid consultant's services -- can be
|
||||
handled by consultants the LUG helps them contact.
|
||||
handled by LUGs <it>gratis</it>, while their complex needs and problems --
|
||||
the kind requiring paid services -- can be fielded by consultants found
|
||||
through the LUG.
|
||||
|
||||
The line between support requests needing a consultant and those
|
||||
that don't is sometimes indistinct; but, in most cases, the difference
|
||||
|
@ -544,11 +519,31 @@ politely suggest that her needs would be better served by paid
|
|||
the borderline is inherently debatable and a likely source of
|
||||
controversy.
|
||||
|
||||
Telltale signs that a questioner may need to be transitioned to consulting-based assistance include:
|
||||
|
||||
<itemize>
|
||||
<item>An insistence on getting solutions in "recipe" (rote) form, with the apparent aim
|
||||
of not needing to learn technological fundamentals.
|
||||
<item>Asking the same questions (or ones closely related) repeatedly.
|
||||
<item>Vague problem descriptions, or ones that change with time.
|
||||
<item>Interrupting answers in order to ask additional questions (suggesting
|
||||
lack of attention to the answers).
|
||||
<item>Demands that answers be recast or delivered more quickly (suggesting
|
||||
that the questioner's time and trouble but that helpers' are not).
|
||||
<item>Asking unusually complex, time-consuming, and/or multipart questions.
|
||||
</itemize>
|
||||
|
||||
In general, LUG members are especially delighted to help, on a volunteer basis, members
|
||||
who seem likely to participate in the Linux "gift culture" by picking up its body of lore
|
||||
and, in turn, perpetuate it by teaching others in their turn. Certainly, there's nothing
|
||||
wrong with having other priorities and values, but such folk may in some cases be best
|
||||
referred to paid assistance, as a better fit for both their needs.
|
||||
|
||||
An additional observation that may or may not be useful, at this point:
|
||||
There are things one may be willing to do for free, to assist others in the
|
||||
Linux community, that one will refuse to do for money: Shifting from
|
||||
assisting someone as a volunteer fundamentally changes the relationship.
|
||||
A fellow hobbyist who suddenly becomes a customer is a very different
|
||||
A fellow computerist who suddenly becomes a customer is a very different
|
||||
person; one's responsibilities are quite different, and greater. You're
|
||||
advised to be aware, if not wary, of this distinction.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -560,7 +555,8 @@ international list of Linux consultants.
|
|||
<p>
|
||||
LUGs also have the opportunity to support local businesses and
|
||||
organisations. This support has two aspects: First, LUGs can support
|
||||
businesses and organisations wanting to use Linux as a part of their
|
||||
businesses and organisations wanting to use Linux (and Linux-based
|
||||
applications) as a part of their
|
||||
computing and IT efforts. Second, LUGs can support local businesses
|
||||
and organisations developing software for Linux, cater to Linux users,
|
||||
support or install Linux, etc.
|
||||
|
@ -570,12 +566,9 @@ a part of their computing operations differs little from the help LUGs
|
|||
give individuals trying Linux at home. For example, compiling the Linux
|
||||
kernel doesn't really differ. Supporting businesses, however, may
|
||||
require supporting proprietary Linux software -- e.g., the Oracle, Sybase,
|
||||
and DB2 databases (or VMware, Win4Lin, and such things). If Linux is to
|
||||
maintain momentum as a viable, general computing environment, it needs
|
||||
software vendors willing to write for (and port to) Linux as a
|
||||
proprietary-application platform. If LUGs helps business users evaluate
|
||||
proprietary Linux solutions, more software vendors will consider Linux
|
||||
in their development and planning.
|
||||
and DB2 databases (or VMware, Win4Lin, and such things).
|
||||
Some LUG expertise in these areas may help businesses make the leap
|
||||
into Linux deployments.
|
||||
|
||||
This leads us directly to the second kind of support a LUG can give to
|
||||
local businesses: LUGs can serve as a clearinghouse for information
|
||||
|
@ -602,7 +595,7 @@ organising charitable giving. <url name="Chris Browne"
|
|||
url="mailto:cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com"> has thought about this issue as much as
|
||||
anyone I know, and he contributes the following:
|
||||
|
||||
<sect3>Chris Browne on free software philanthropy
|
||||
<sect3>Chris Browne on free software / open source philanthropy
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
A further involvement can be to encourage sponsorship of various
|
||||
Linux-related organisations in a financial way. With the <url
|
||||
|
@ -712,11 +705,11 @@ Education Foundation">
|
|||
The Open Source Education Foundation's purpose to enhance K-12 education
|
||||
through the use of technologies and concepts derived from The Open
|
||||
Source and Free Software movement. In conjunction with Tux4Kids, OSEF
|
||||
created a bootable distribution of GNU/Linux based on Klaus Knopper's
|
||||
Knoppix, aimed at kids, parents, teachers, and other school officials.
|
||||
OSEF installs and supports school computer labs, and has developed a
|
||||
"K12 Box" as a compact Plug and Play workstation computer for student
|
||||
computer labs.
|
||||
created a bootable distribution of GNU/Linux (Knoppix for Kids) based
|
||||
on Klaus Knopper's Knoppix, aimed at kids, parents, teachers, and
|
||||
other school officials. OSEF installs and supports school computer labs,
|
||||
and has developed a "K12 Box" as a compact Plug and Play workstation
|
||||
computer for student computer labs.
|
||||
|
||||
<item> <url url="http://www.osafoundation.org/donations.htm" name="Open
|
||||
Source Applications Foundation">
|
||||
|
@ -740,7 +733,8 @@ organised. It isn't a corporation, but is important to businesses
|
|||
everywhere. The best way for a LUG to support the international Linux
|
||||
movement is to keep the local Linux community robust, vibrant, and
|
||||
growing. Linux is <it>developed</it> internationally, which is easy
|
||||
enough to see by reading <file>/usr/src/linux/MAINTAINERS</file> -- but
|
||||
enough to see by reading the kernel source code's
|
||||
<file>MAINTAINERS</file> file -- but
|
||||
Linux is also <it>used</it> internationally. This ever-expanding
|
||||
user base is key to Linux's continued success, and is where the LUGs
|
||||
are vital.
|
||||
|
@ -781,8 +775,8 @@ It is important that new Linux users come to learn what Linux culture,
|
|||
concepts, traditions, and vocabulary. Linux acculturation, unlike "real
|
||||
world" acculturation, can occur on mailing lists and Usenet, although
|
||||
the latter's efficacy is challenged by poorly acculturated users and by
|
||||
spam. LUGs are often much more efficient at this task than mailing lists
|
||||
or newsgroups, precisely because of the former's greater interactivity
|
||||
spam. LUGs are often much more efficient at this task than are mailing
|
||||
lists or newsgroups, precisely because of the former's greater interactivity
|
||||
and personal focus.
|
||||
|
||||
<sect>LUG activities
|
||||
|
@ -832,7 +826,7 @@ pages, if not whole Web sites. In fact, I'm not sure how else to find a
|
|||
LUG, but to check the Web.
|
||||
|
||||
It makes sense, then, for a LUG to make use of whatever Internet
|
||||
technologies they can: Web sites, mailing lists, wikis, FTP, e-mail, Web
|
||||
technologies they can: Web sites, mailing lists, wikis, ftp, e-mail, Web
|
||||
discussion forums, netnews, etc. As the world of commerce is
|
||||
discovering, the 'Net is an effective way to advertise, inform, educate,
|
||||
and even sell. The other reason LUGs make extensive use of Internet
|
||||
|
@ -872,7 +866,7 @@ spends considerable time discussing Web issues. Quoting it (in outline form):
|
|||
<item>You may want to consider establishing a LUG mailing list.
|
||||
<item>You don't need to be in the Internet Service Provider business.
|
||||
<item>Don't go into any other business, either.
|
||||
<item>Walk the walk.
|
||||
<item>Walk the walk. (Do the LUG's computing on Linux.)
|
||||
</itemize>
|
||||
|
||||
That essay partly supplements (and partly overlaps) this HOWTO.
|
||||
|
@ -964,16 +958,16 @@ There are several organisations offering assistance to LUGs.
|
|||
|
||||
<itemize>
|
||||
|
||||
<item>Determine the nearest existing LUG</item>
|
||||
<item>Announce your intentions on <tt>comp.os.linux.announce</tt> and on an appropriate regional hierarchy</item>
|
||||
<item>Determine the nearest existing LUG.</item>
|
||||
<item>Announce your intentions on <tt>comp.os.linux.announce</tt> and on an appropriate regional hierarchy.</item>
|
||||
<item>Announce your intention wherever computer users are in your area: bookstores, swap meets, cybercafes, colleges and universities, corporations, Internet service providers, etc.</item>
|
||||
<item>Find Linux-friendly businesses or institutions in your area willing to help you form the LUG</item>
|
||||
<item>Form a mailing list or some means of communication among the people who express an interest in forming a LUG</item>
|
||||
<item>Ask key people specifically for help in spreading the word about your intention to form a LUG</item>
|
||||
<item>Solicit space on a Web server to put a few HTML pages together about the group</item>
|
||||
<item>Begin looking for a meeting place</item>
|
||||
<item>Schedule an initial meeting</item>
|
||||
<item>Discuss at the initial meeting the goals for the LUG</item>
|
||||
<item>Find Linux-friendly businesses or institutions in your area willing to help you form the LUG.</item>
|
||||
<item>Form a mailing list or some means of communication among the people who express an interest in forming a LUG.</item>
|
||||
<item>Ask key people specifically for help in spreading the word about your intention to form a LUG.</item>
|
||||
<item>Solicit space on a Web server to put a few HTML pages together about the group.</item>
|
||||
<item>Begin looking for a meeting place.</item>
|
||||
<item>Schedule an initial meeting.</item>
|
||||
<item>Discuss at the initial meeting the goals for the LUG.</item>
|
||||
|
||||
</itemize>
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -982,39 +976,39 @@ There are several organisations offering assistance to LUGs.
|
|||
|
||||
<itemize>
|
||||
|
||||
<item>Make the barriers to LUG membership as low as possible</item>
|
||||
<item>Make the LUG's Web site a priority: keep all information current, make it easy to find details about meetings (who, what, and where), and make contact information and feedback mechanisms prominent</item>
|
||||
<item>Install Linux for anyone who wants it</item>
|
||||
<item>Post flyers, messages, or handbills wherever computer users are in your area</item>
|
||||
<item>Secure dedicated leadership</item>
|
||||
<item>Follow Linus's <it>benevolent dictator</it> model of leadership</item>
|
||||
<item>Take the big decisions to the members for a vote</item>
|
||||
<item>Start a mailing list devoted to technical support and ask the "gurus" to participate on it</item>
|
||||
<item>Schedule a mixture of advanced and basic, formal and informal, presentations</item>
|
||||
<item>Support the software development efforts of your members</item>
|
||||
<item>Find way to raise money without dues: for instance, selling Linux merchandise to your members and to others</item>
|
||||
<item>Consider securing formal legal standing for the group, such as incorporation or tax-exempt status</item>
|
||||
<item>Find out if your meeting place is restricting growth of the LUG</item>
|
||||
<item>Meet in conjunction with swap meets, computer shows, or other community events where computer users -- i.e., potential Linux converts -- are likely to gather</item>
|
||||
<item>Elect formal leadership for the LUG as soon as is practical: Some helpful officers might include President, Treasurer, Secretary, Meeting Host (general announcements, speaker introductions, opening and closing remarks, etc.), Publicity Coordinator (handles Usenet and e-mail postings, local publicity), and Program Coordinator (organises and schedules speakers at LUG meetings)</item>
|
||||
<item>Provide ways for members and others to give feedback about the direction, goals, and strategies of the LUG</item>
|
||||
<item>Support Linux and free software development efforts by donating Web space, a mailing list, or FTP site</item>
|
||||
<item>Establish an FTP/Web site for relevant software</item>
|
||||
<item>Archive everything the LUG does for the Web site</item>
|
||||
<item>Solicit "door prizes" from Linux vendors, VARs, etc. to give away at meetings</item>
|
||||
<item>Give credit where due</item>
|
||||
<item>Join SSC's GLUE (Groups of Linux Users Everywhere) but be aware they charge a membership fee</item>
|
||||
<item>Submit your LUG's information to all the LUG lists</item>
|
||||
<item>Publicise your meetings on appropriate Usenet groups and in local computer publications and newspapers</item>
|
||||
<item>Make the barriers to LUG membership as low as possible.</item>
|
||||
<item>Make the LUG's Web site a priority: Keep all information current, make it easy to find details about meetings (who, what, and where), and make contact information and feedback mechanisms prominent.</item>
|
||||
<item>Install Linux for anyone who wants it.</item>
|
||||
<item>Post flyers, messages, or handbills wherever computer users are in your area.</item>
|
||||
<item>Secure dedicated leadership.</item>
|
||||
<item>Follow Linus's <it>benevolent dictator</it> model of leadership.</item>
|
||||
<item>Take the big decisions to the members for a vote.</item>
|
||||
<item>Start a mailing list devoted to technical support and ask the "gurus" to participate on it.</item>
|
||||
<item>Schedule a mixture of advanced and basic, formal and informal, presentations.</item>
|
||||
<item>Support the software development efforts of your members.</item>
|
||||
<item>Find way to raise money without dues: for instance, selling Linux merchandise to your members and to others.</item>
|
||||
<item>Consider securing formal legal standing for the group, such as incorporation or tax-exempt status.</item>
|
||||
<item>Find out if your meeting place is restricting growth of the LUG.</item>
|
||||
<item>Meet in conjunction with swap meets, computer shows, or other community events where computer users -- i.e., potential Linux converts -- are likely to gather.</item>
|
||||
<item>Elect formal leadership for the LUG as soon as is practical: Some helpful officers might include President, Treasurer, Secretary, Meeting Host (general announcements, speaker introductions, opening and closing remarks, etc.), Publicity Coordinator (handles Usenet and e-mail postings, local publicity), and Program Coordinator (organises and schedules speakers at LUG meetings).</item>
|
||||
<item>Provide ways for members and others to give feedback about the direction, goals, and strategies of the LUG.</item>
|
||||
<item>Support Linux and free software / open source development efforts by donating Web space, a mailing list, or FTP site.</item>
|
||||
<item>Establish an FTP/Web site for relevant software.</item>
|
||||
<item>Archive everything the LUG does for the Web site.</item>
|
||||
<item>Solicit "door prizes" from Linux vendors, VARs, etc. to give away at meetings.</item>
|
||||
<item>Give credit where due.</item>
|
||||
<item>Join SSC's GLUE (Groups of Linux Users Everywhere), but be aware they charge a membership fee.</item>
|
||||
<item>Submit your LUG's information to all the LUG lists.</item>
|
||||
<item>Publicise your meetings on appropriate Usenet groups and in local computer publications and newspapers.</item>
|
||||
<item>Compose promotional materials, like Postscript files, for instance, members can use to help publicise the LUG at workplaces, bookstores, computer stores, etc.</item>
|
||||
<item>Make sure you know what LUG members want the LUG to do</item>
|
||||
<item>Make sure you know what LUG members want the LUG to do.</item>
|
||||
<item>Release press releases to local media outlets about any unusual LUG events like an Installation Fest, Net Day, etc.</item>
|
||||
<item>Use LUG resources and members to help local non-profit organisations and schools with their Information Technology needs</item>
|
||||
<item>Advocate the use of Linux zealously but responsibly</item>
|
||||
<item>Play to LUG members's strengths</item>
|
||||
<item>Use LUG resources and members to help local non-profit organisations and schools with their Information Technology needs.</item>
|
||||
<item>Advocate the use of Linux zealously but responsibly.</item>
|
||||
<item>Play to LUG members' strengths.</item>
|
||||
<item>Maintain good relations with Linux vendors, VARs, developers, etc.</item>
|
||||
<item>Identify and contact Linux consultants in your area
|
||||
<item>Network with the leaders of other LUGs in your area, state, region, or country to share experiences, tricks, and resources</item>
|
||||
<item>Identify and contact Linux consultants in your area.</item>
|
||||
<item>Network with the leaders of other LUGs in your area, state, region, or country to share experiences, tricks, and resources.</item>
|
||||
<item>Keep LUG members advised on the state of Linux software -- new kernels, bugs, fixes, patches, security advisories -- and the state of the Linux world at large -- new ports, trademark and licensing issues, where Linus is living and working, etc.</item>
|
||||
<item>Notify the Linux Documentation Project -- and other pertinent sources of Linux information -- about the documentation the LUG produces: technical presentations, tutorials, local HOWTOs, etc.</item>
|
||||
</itemize>
|
||||
|
@ -1031,7 +1025,7 @@ liability and helps the group carry insurance. It aids fundraising.
|
|||
It avoids claims for tax on group income.
|
||||
|
||||
<it>Con:</it> Liability shouldn't be a problem for modestly careful
|
||||
people. You're not doing skydiving, after all. Fundraising isn't needed
|
||||
people. (You're not doing skydiving, after all.) Fundraising isn't needed
|
||||
for a group whose activities needn't involve significant expenses.
|
||||
(Dead-tree newsletters are so 1980.) Not needing a treasury, you avoid
|
||||
needing to argue over it, file reports about it, or fear it being taxed
|
||||
|
@ -1039,7 +1033,7 @@ away. Meeting space can usually be gotten for free at ISPs, colleges,
|
|||
pizza parlours, brewpubs, coffeehouses, computer-training firms,
|
||||
Linux-oriented companies, or other friendly institutions, and can
|
||||
therefore be free of charge to the public. No revenues and no expenses
|
||||
means less need for organisation and comcomitant hassles.
|
||||
means less need for organisation and concomitant hassles.
|
||||
|
||||
For what it's worth, this HOWTO's originator and second maintainer lean,
|
||||
respectively, towards the pro and con sides of the debate -- but choose
|
||||
|
@ -1062,7 +1056,7 @@ attain:
|
|||
</enum>
|
||||
|
||||
Although relevant statutes differ among states, most states
|
||||
allow user groups to incorporate as non-profit entitites. Benefits
|
||||
allow user groups to incorporate as non-profit entities. Benefits
|
||||
of incorporation for a LUG include limitations of liability
|
||||
of LUG members and volunteers, as well as limitation or even exemption
|
||||
from state corporate franchise taxes.
|
||||
|
@ -1121,16 +1115,16 @@ name="http://www.wegweiser-buergergesellschaft.de/praxishilfen/arbeit_im_verein/
|
|||
following to say about the kinds of intra-LUG political dynamics that
|
||||
often crop up (lightly edited and expanded by the HOWTO maintainer):
|
||||
|
||||
<sect2>People have different feelings about free software.
|
||||
<sect2>People have different feelings about free / open-source software
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Linux users are a diverse bunch. As soon as you try to put a lot of
|
||||
them together, <it>some</it> problem issues can arise. Some, who are
|
||||
nearly political radicals, believe all software, always, should be
|
||||
"free". Because Caldera charges quite a lot of money for their
|
||||
distribution, and doesn't give all profits over to <it>(pick favorite
|
||||
advocacy organisation)</it>, they must be "evil". Ditto Red Hat or
|
||||
advocacy organisation)</it>, it must be "evil". Ditto Red Hat or
|
||||
SuSE. Keep in mind that all three of these companies have made and
|
||||
continue to make significant contributions to free software.
|
||||
continue to make significant contributions to free / open-source software.
|
||||
|
||||
(HOWTO maintainer's note: The above was a 1998 note, from before
|
||||
Caldera exited the Linux business, renamed itself to The SCO Group,
|
||||
|
@ -1174,7 +1168,7 @@ possible and encouraged.
|
|||
proprietary-software vendors, e.g., in the Linux kernel, XFree86, and
|
||||
gcc.
|
||||
|
||||
<item> Proprietary imples neither better nor horrible.
|
||||
<item> Proprietary implies neither better nor horrible.
|
||||
|
||||
</itemize>
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1193,9 +1187,9 @@ skins.
|
|||
<sect2>Non-profit organisations and money don't mix terribly well.
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
It is important to be careful with finances in any sort of non-profit.
|
||||
In businesses, which focus on substative profit, people are not
|
||||
In businesses, which focus on substantive profit, people are not
|
||||
typically too worried about minor details such as alleged misspending of
|
||||
immaterial sums. The same cannot be said about non-profit
|
||||
immaterial sums. The same cannot be said of non-profit
|
||||
organisations. Some people are involved for reasons of principle, and
|
||||
devote inordinate attention to otherwise minor issues. LUG business
|
||||
meetings' potential for wide participation correspondingly expands the
|
||||
|
@ -1208,11 +1202,11 @@ can reasonably demand accountability. Fees not collected can't be
|
|||
misused -- or squabbled over.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
If there <it>is</it> a lot of money and/or other substantive property
|
||||
If there <it>is</it> a lot of money and/or other substantive property,
|
||||
the user group must be accountable to members.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Any vital, growing group, should have more than one active person. In
|
||||
Any vital, growing group should have more than one active person. In
|
||||
troubled nonprofits, financial information is often tightly held by
|
||||
someone who will not willingly relinquish monetary control. Ideally,
|
||||
there should be <it>some</it> LUG duty rotation, including duties
|
||||
|
@ -1232,33 +1226,68 @@ possible to publish these on the World-Wide Web.
|
|||
|
||||
<sect1>Elections, democracy, and turnover
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Operating your LUG via democratic process is absolutely vital -- if and
|
||||
Governing your LUG democratically is absolutely vital -- if and
|
||||
only if you believe it is. I intend that remark somewhat less cynically
|
||||
than it probably sounds, as I shall explain.
|
||||
|
||||
Tangible stakes in LUG politics tend to be minuscule to the point of
|
||||
comic opera: There are typically no real assets, and differences can be
|
||||
resolved by either engineering around them with technology (the Linux-ey
|
||||
solution) or through the trivial exercise of setting up a parallel
|
||||
effort (either in an additional LUG or otherwise). Moreover, even the
|
||||
Tangible stakes at issue in LUG politics tend to be minuscule to the point of
|
||||
comic opera: There are typically no real assets. Differences of view
|
||||
can be resolved by either engineering around them with technology (the Linux-ey
|
||||
solution) or by letting each camp run efforts in parallel. Moreover, even the
|
||||
most militantly "democratic" LUGs typically field, like clockwork,
|
||||
exactly as many candidates as there are offices to be elected -- not a
|
||||
exactly as many candidates as there are offices to be filled -- not a
|
||||
soul more.
|
||||
|
||||
It's tempting to mock such exercises, as form over substance, but such
|
||||
is not (much) my intent (nor to claim irregularities). Rather, I
|
||||
mention them to point out something more significant: Active volunteers
|
||||
are vital, and should be encouraged. It seems likely that the
|
||||
It's tempting to mock such exercises as empty posturing, but such
|
||||
is not (much) my intent. Rather, I
|
||||
mention them to point out something more significant: Attracting and
|
||||
retaining key volunteers is vital to the group's success. Anything that
|
||||
makes that happen is good. It seems likely that the
|
||||
"democratic" exercise stressed in some groups, substantive or not,
|
||||
encourages participation, and gives those elected a sense of status and
|
||||
legitimacy. Those are Good Things.
|
||||
encourages participation, and gives those elected a sense of status,
|
||||
legitimacy, and involvement. Those are Good Things.
|
||||
|
||||
Thus, if elections and formal structure help involve active
|
||||
participants, use them. If their absence helps attract participants,
|
||||
Thus, if elections and formal structure help attract key
|
||||
participants, use them. If those deter participants,
|
||||
lose them. If door-prizes and garage sales bring people in, do
|
||||
door-prizes and garage sales. Participation, as much as software, is
|
||||
the lifeblood of your LUG.
|
||||
|
||||
The reason I spoke of "key" volunteers, above, is because, inevitably, a very few
|
||||
people will do almost all of the needed work. It's just the way things go, in
|
||||
volunteer groups. An anecdote may help illustrate my point: Towards the end
|
||||
of my long tenure as editor and typesetter of San Francisco PC User Group's
|
||||
40-page monthly magazine, I was repeatedly urged to make magazine
|
||||
management more "democratic". I finally replied to the club president,
|
||||
"See that guy over there? That's Ed, one of my editorial staff. Ed just
|
||||
proofread twelve articles for the current issue. So, I figure he gets
|
||||
twelve votes." The president and other club politicos were dismayed by my
|
||||
of my work-based recasting of their democratic ideals: Their notion was that each
|
||||
biped should have an equal say in editorial policy, regardless of ability to
|
||||
typeset or proofread, or whether they had ever done iota to assist magazine
|
||||
production. Although he looked quite unhappy about doing so, the president
|
||||
dropped the subject. I figured that, when it came right down to it, he'd
|
||||
decide that the club needed people who got work done more than they
|
||||
needed his brand of "democracy".
|
||||
|
||||
But we weren't quite done: A month or so later, I was introduced to a
|
||||
"Publications Committee", who arrived with the intent of doing nothing but
|
||||
vote on matters of newsletter policy (i.e., issue "executive" orders to the
|
||||
volunteer production staff). Their first shock came when I listened politely
|
||||
to their advice but then applied my editorial judgement as usual. Much
|
||||
worse, though: I also assigned them work, as part of my staff. Almost
|
||||
all immediately lost interest. (Bossing around other people seemed likely
|
||||
to be fun; doing actual work was not.)
|
||||
|
||||
The point is that the widespread urge to vote on everything is at best orthogonal
|
||||
to any desire to perform needed work; at worst, the former serves as an
|
||||
excuse to compulsively meddle in other people's performance of the
|
||||
latter.
|
||||
|
||||
To sum up: Have all the "democracy" that makes you happy, but watching after
|
||||
the well-being of your key volunteers is what matters. (To quote Candide,
|
||||
"We must cultivate our garden.")
|
||||
|
||||
Last, plan for your replacement: If your LUG is a college student
|
||||
group, and must go through a paperwork deathmarch every year to stay
|
||||
accredited, make sure that and all other vital processes are documented,
|
||||
|
@ -1296,10 +1325,9 @@ I welcome questions about and feedback on this document. Please send
|
|||
them to me at <htmlurl name="rick@linuxmafia.com"
|
||||
url="mailto:rick@linuxmafia.com">. <it>I am especially interested in
|
||||
hearing from LUG leaders around the world</it>. I'd like to include
|
||||
real-life examples of things described here. I'd also like to include
|
||||
more on LUGs outside the USA, to reduce this HOWTO's residual
|
||||
US-centrism. Please let me know of things your group does meriting
|
||||
description here.
|
||||
real-life examples of things described here. I'm particularly trying to
|
||||
include more on LUGs outside the USA. Please let me know of
|
||||
things your group does meriting description here.
|
||||
|
||||
<sect1>Document history
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
|
@ -1318,7 +1346,7 @@ description here.
|
|||
donations and LUG political considerations.</item>
|
||||
<item>1.6.1: Very minor additions.</item>
|
||||
<item>1.6.2: Minor corrections.</item>
|
||||
<item>1.6.3: Maintenance assumed by Rick Moen: General initial touchup,
|
||||
<item>1.6.3: Maintenance assumed by Rick Moen: General initial touch-up,
|
||||
correction of broken URLs, etc.
|
||||
<item>1.6.4: Further minor fixes and additions.
|
||||
<item>1.6.5: More-extensive edits, added "Limits of advocacy",
|
||||
|
@ -1328,8 +1356,11 @@ tightening of phrasing, greater brevity in places.
|
|||
<item>1.6.6: More small fixes, added Yahoo LUG list.
|
||||
<item>1.6.7: Added formal-organisational pros/cons, "Elections,
|
||||
democracy, and turnover" section, Web site suggestions, and link
|
||||
to Recipe for a Successful Linux User Group" essay. Fixed mis-tagged
|
||||
to "Recipe for a Successful Linux User Group" essay. Fixed mis-tagged
|
||||
sections under "Legal and political issues".
|
||||
<item>1.6.8: Fixed small glitches. Rewrote section concerning
|
||||
Linux news outlets; parts of sections concerning consultants, businesses,
|
||||
and elections.
|
||||
</itemize>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1343,9 +1374,9 @@ over and renovate his creation starting in 2003.
|
|||
Warn regards and thanks to <url name="Chris Browne"
|
||||
url="mailto:cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com"> for describing the situation with
|
||||
non-profit and charitable groups in Canada, his thoughts on financial
|
||||
donations as a way to participate in Linux and the free software
|
||||
movement, and his ideas about the kinds of political issues likely to
|
||||
arise within LUGs.
|
||||
donations as a way to participate in Linux and the free software and
|
||||
open-source software movements, and his ideas about the kinds of
|
||||
political issues likely to arise within LUGs.
|
||||
|
||||
In addition, the following people have made helpful comments and
|
||||
suggestions:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue