207 lines
7.8 KiB
HTML
207 lines
7.8 KiB
HTML
<!-- MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
|
|
<!--X-Subject: Re: date formats -->
|
|
<!--X-From-R13: Fnxrgbfuv Enab <xtu12351Navsgl.ar.wc> -->
|
|
<!--X-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:28:54 -0500 (EST) -->
|
|
<!--X-Message-Id: y5ad7f0j2i7.fsf@kgh12351.nifty.ne.jp -->
|
|
<!--X-Content-Type: text/plain -->
|
|
<!--X-Reference: 20001207090627.A11176@lupercalia.net -->
|
|
<!--X-Reference: 10012071040.ZM18879@hoop.timonium.sgi.com -->
|
|
<!--X-Head-End-->
|
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML//EN">
|
|
<html>
|
|
<head>
|
|
<title>Re: date formats</title>
|
|
<link rev="made" href="mailto:kgh12351@nifty.ne.jp">
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
<!--X-Body-Begin-->
|
|
<!--X-User-Header-->
|
|
<!--X-User-Header-End-->
|
|
<!--X-TopPNI-->
|
|
<hr>
|
|
[<a href="msg04622.html">Date Prev</a>][<a href="msg04624.html">Date Next</a>][<a href="msg04643.html">Thread Prev</a>][<a href="msg04636.html">Thread Next</a>][<a href="maillist.html#04623">Date Index</a>][<a href="threads.html#04623">Thread Index</a>]
|
|
<!--X-TopPNI-End-->
|
|
<!--X-MsgBody-->
|
|
<!--X-Subject-Header-Begin-->
|
|
<h1>Re: date formats</h1>
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<!--X-Subject-Header-End-->
|
|
<!--X-Head-of-Message-->
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li><em>To</em>: "Greg Ferguson" <<A HREF="mailto:gferg@hoop.timonium.sgi.com">gferg@hoop.timonium.sgi.com</A>></li>
|
|
<li><em>Subject</em>: Re: date formats</li>
|
|
<li><em>From</em>: Taketoshi Sano <<A HREF="mailto:kgh12351@nifty.ne.jp">kgh12351@nifty.ne.jp</A>></li>
|
|
<li><em>Date</em>: 10 Dec 2000 13:58:55 +0900</li>
|
|
<li><em>Cc</em>: ldp-discuss <<A HREF="mailto:ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org">ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org</A>>, <A HREF="mailto:ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org">ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org</A></li>
|
|
<li><em>In-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg04594.html">10012071040.ZM18879@hoop.timonium.sgi.com</a>> ("Greg Ferguson"'s message of "Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:40:58 -0500")</li>
|
|
<li><em>References</em>: <<a href="msg04593.html">20001207090627.A11176@lupercalia.net</a>><<a href="msg04594.html">10012071040.ZM18879@hoop.timonium.sgi.com</a>></li>
|
|
<li><em>Resent-date</em>: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:28:54 -0500 (EST)</li>
|
|
<li><em>Resent-from</em>: <A HREF="mailto:ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org">ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org</A></li>
|
|
<li><em>Resent-message-id</em>: <GyrHaB.A.dmE.yJBN6@murphy></li>
|
|
<li><em>Resent-sender</em>: <A HREF="mailto:ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org">ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org</A></li>
|
|
<li><em>User-agent</em>: Semi-gnus/6.10.12 SEMI/1.12.1 ([JR] Nonoichi) FLIM/1.12.7(Yūzaki) Emacs/20.7 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/4.0(HANANOEN)</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
<!--X-Head-of-Message-End-->
|
|
<!--X-Head-Body-Sep-Begin-->
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<!--X-Head-Body-Sep-End-->
|
|
<!--X-Body-of-Message-->
|
|
<pre>
|
|
Hi.
|
|
|
|
In <<a href="msg04594.html">10012071040.ZM18879@hoop.timonium.sgi.com</a>>,
|
|
on Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:40:58 -0500,
|
|
"Greg Ferguson" <gferg@hoop.timonium.sgi.com> wrote:
|
|
|
|
> A recommendation is outlined below; I've extended this as to what
|
|
> I think would comprise a good/valid MINIMUM set of elements for
|
|
> a header area for LDP documents:
|
|
>
|
|
> ---
|
|
>
|
|
> if linuxdoc:
|
|
>
|
|
> <title>title of HOWTO, include "HOWTO" or "mini HOWTO"</title>
|
|
> <author>first_name last_name,
|
|
> <htmlurl url="<A HREF="mailto:email_address"">mailto:email_address"</A>; name="email_address">
|
|
> </author>
|
|
> * <date>v1.0, DD MMM YYYY</date>
|
|
> <abstract>
|
|
> brief description of what the document covers
|
|
> </abstract>
|
|
>
|
|
> * unless a version tag is added; then split version out
|
|
|
|
If that (adding a new version element) will work for smooth
|
|
migration to the docbook, then I'll consider it. But it will
|
|
take several weeks or months since I'm being very busy recently.
|
|
|
|
Basically I feel reluctant to modify/extend the DTD itself on
|
|
linuxdoc, since I originally intend to maintain it just to keep
|
|
backward-compatibility. But I think the consensus on this list
|
|
wish to have the trans/tdate tag added in the linuxdoc dtd, so
|
|
I'm plan to integrate the separate linuxdoctr/linuxdoc dtd into
|
|
the new linuxdoc dtd.
|
|
(As a sidenote, xfree86 dtd which is developped based on the linuxdoc
|
|
dtd fro XFree86 documents, now accepts trans/tdate elements since
|
|
version 1.1.3 of doctools/xfree86. You can get it from ftp.xfree86.org
|
|
along with the XFree86 4.0.1 source. XFree86 doc team now also do their
|
|
effort to migrate their documents into docbook/xml, of course.)
|
|
|
|
For backward-compatibility purpose, I'll retain the support of
|
|
linuxdoctr dtd, but linuxdoc/linuxdoctr will be handled equally
|
|
in the future version of linuxdoc-tools.
|
|
(Please do not ask me "when ?" ;)
|
|
|
|
> ---
|
|
>
|
|
> if DocBook:
|
|
>
|
|
> <artheader>
|
|
>
|
|
> <title>title of HOWTO, include "HOWTO" or "mini HOWTO"</title>
|
|
>
|
|
> <author>
|
|
> <firstname>first_name</firstname>
|
|
> <surname>last_name</surname>
|
|
> <affiliation>
|
|
> <address>
|
|
> <email>email_address</email>
|
|
> </address>
|
|
> </affiliation>
|
|
> </author>
|
|
>
|
|
> <!-- Additional author entries go here -->
|
|
>
|
|
> <pubdate>DD MMM YYYY</pubdate>
|
|
>
|
|
> <revhistory>
|
|
> <revision>
|
|
> <revnumber>v2.0</revnumber>
|
|
> <date>DD MMM YYYY</date>
|
|
> </revision>
|
|
>
|
|
> <!-- Additional, *earlier* revision histories go here -->
|
|
|
|
I wish to have the additional <revision> element for translation
|
|
here for translated docbook documents. Can we agree on this ?
|
|
|
|
Translation maybe updated for the same original documents with
|
|
various reasons such as addition of local translation note for
|
|
some domestic status explanations or correction of translation
|
|
errors.
|
|
|
|
> </revhistory>
|
|
>
|
|
> <abstract>
|
|
> <para>
|
|
> brief description of the document
|
|
> </para>
|
|
> </abstract>
|
|
>
|
|
> </artheader>
|
|
>
|
|
> ---
|
|
>
|
|
> More tags *could* be used (<othercredit>, <titleabbrev>, <orgname>,
|
|
> <copyright>, <authorinitials>, <revremark>, etc.) and perhaps
|
|
> more should be used, but I see this as being a *minimum* set of
|
|
> tags that constitute a valid header area.
|
|
>
|
|
> Please provide comments. As David says, we should get these
|
|
> guidelines into the style section of the LAG.
|
|
|
|
Good work, thanks for your effort.
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Taketoshi Sano: <kgh12351@nifty.ne.jp>
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
|
|
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|
|
|
|
</pre>
|
|
|
|
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
|
|
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
|
|
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
|
|
<hr>
|
|
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
|
|
<!--X-References-->
|
|
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li><strong><a name="04593" href="msg04593.html">date formats</a></strong>
|
|
<ul><li><em>From:</em> David Merrill <dmerrill@lupercalia.net></li></ul></li>
|
|
<li><strong><a name="04594" href="msg04594.html">Re: date formats</a></strong>
|
|
<ul><li><em>From:</em> "Greg Ferguson" <gferg@hoop.timonium.sgi.com></li></ul></li>
|
|
</ul></li></ul>
|
|
<!--X-References-End-->
|
|
<!--X-BotPNI-->
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li>Prev by Date:
|
|
<strong><a href="msg04622.html">Re: date formats</a></strong>
|
|
</li>
|
|
<li>Next by Date:
|
|
<strong><a href="msg04624.html">Feedback</a></strong>
|
|
</li>
|
|
<li>Previous by thread:
|
|
<strong><a href="msg04643.html">Re: date formats</a></strong>
|
|
</li>
|
|
<li>Next by thread:
|
|
<strong><a href="msg04636.html">RE: date formats</a></strong>
|
|
</li>
|
|
<li>Index(es):
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li><a href="maillist.html#04623"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="threads.html#04623"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
|
|
<!--X-User-Footer-->
|
|
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
|
|
</body>
|
|
</html>
|