old-www/pub/Linux/docs/ldp-archived/mail_archives/ldp-discuss/msg03596.html

145 lines
6.3 KiB
HTML

<!-- MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
<!--X-Subject: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal -->
<!--X-From-R13: Rnivq Znjlre <qnirNynsa.bet> -->
<!--X-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 01:52:28 &#45;0400 (EDT) -->
<!--X-Message-Id: 20000730224907.A135@localhost -->
<!--X-Content-Type: text/plain -->
<!--X-Reference: 20000730161430.B135@localhost -->
<!--X-Reference: Pine.LNX.4.21.0007301909340.4393&#45;100000@crazypenguins.commandprompt.com -->
<!--X-Head-End-->
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title>Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal</title>
<link rev="made" href="mailto:dave@lafn.org">
</head>
<body>
<!--X-Body-Begin-->
<!--X-User-Header-->
<!--X-User-Header-End-->
<!--X-TopPNI-->
<hr>
[<a href="msg03595.html">Date Prev</a>][<a href="msg03597.html">Date Next</a>][<a href="msg03590.html">Thread Prev</a>][<a href="msg03613.html">Thread Next</a>][<a href="maillist.html#03596">Date Index</a>][<a href="threads.html#03596">Thread Index</a>]
<!--X-TopPNI-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-->
<!--X-Subject-Header-Begin-->
<h1>Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal</h1>
<hr>
<!--X-Subject-Header-End-->
<!--X-Head-of-Message-->
<ul>
<li><em>To</em>: Poet/Joshua Drake &lt;<A HREF="mailto:poet@linuxports.com">poet@linuxports.com</A>&gt;</li>
<li><em>Subject</em>: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal</li>
<li><em>From</em>: David Lawyer &lt;<A HREF="mailto:dave@lafn.org">dave@lafn.org</A>&gt;</li>
<li><em>Date</em>: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 22:49:07 -0700</li>
<li><em>Cc</em>: David Lawyer &lt;<A HREF="mailto:dave@lafn.org">dave@lafn.org</A>&gt;, <A HREF="mailto:ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org">ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org</A>, Richard Stallman &lt;<A HREF="mailto:rms@gnu.org">rms@gnu.org</A>&gt;, <A HREF="mailto:ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org">ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org</A></li>
<li><em>In-reply-to</em>: &lt;<a href="msg03590.html">Pine.LNX.4.21.0007301909340.4393-100000@crazypenguins.commandprompt.com</a>&gt;</li>
<li><em>Mail-followup-to</em>: Poet/Joshua Drake &lt;poet@linuxports.com&gt;,David Lawyer &lt;dave@lafn.org&gt;, ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org,Richard Stallman &lt;rms@gnu.org&gt;, ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org</li>
<li><em>References</em>: &lt;<a href="msg03587.html">20000730161430.B135@localhost</a>&gt; &lt;<a href="msg03590.html">Pine.LNX.4.21.0007301909340.4393-100000@crazypenguins.commandprompt.com</a>&gt;</li>
<li><em>Resent-date</em>: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 01:52:28 -0400 (EDT)</li>
<li><em>Resent-from</em>: <A HREF="mailto:ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org">ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org</A></li>
<li><em>Resent-message-id</em>: &lt;qRdEj.A.k_E.PRRh5@murphy&gt;</li>
<li><em>Resent-sender</em>: <A HREF="mailto:ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org">ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org</A></li>
<li><em>User-agent</em>: Mutt/1.0pre3i</li>
</ul>
<!--X-Head-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-Head-Body-Sep-Begin-->
<hr>
<!--X-Head-Body-Sep-End-->
<!--X-Body-of-Message-->
<pre>
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 04:14:30PM -0700, David Lawyer wrote:
&gt; &gt;A major defect of the existing policy is the case where a document is
&gt; &gt;not maintained, but prohibits modification without permission of the
&gt; &gt;author. We wind up with obsolete documents that sometimes can't be
&gt; &gt;updated. I think (in theory) that we need to change our policy of
&gt; &gt;what we will accept and from now on not accept documents that can't be
&gt; &gt;modified if the author fails to maintain them to reflect new software
&gt; &gt;(and new hardware in some cases).
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 07:25:31PM -0700, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
&gt;
&gt; This is not a defect as when the document becomes unmaintained and/or
&gt; obsolete it need to be &quot;re-written&quot; anyway. Therefore there would be no
&gt; copyright issues.
In some cases where it is totally obsolete, yes. But in other cases
only a relatively small percent needs to be changed to bring it
up-to-date. It's a lot more work to do it all over again from
scratch.
&gt; It is possible, if one has the means to create a publishable quality
&gt; document. If it is truly publishable quality, the fact that it is on the
&gt; Net, will not effect it. It may actually help the sales of a printed book.
&gt;
I think that for documents that are about rapidly changing technology,
many people would rather get them by electronic means. Print becomes
obsolete too fast. I think it would ultimately hurt sales if it's in
a easy-to-use format.
&gt; Personally I like electronic documentation, but I don't like it when I
&gt; have to wade through a 500 page PDF.
Agreed
&gt; &gt;Thus I don't think Poet's proposal would bring authors much financial
&gt; &gt;benefit and it would go against our principles of free documentation.
&gt;
&gt; I can refute this in several ways. One of the reasons some of the LDP
&gt; authors do not make money at their documentation is that it is not very
&gt; good.
True, but this supports my argument that it wouldn't bring much
financial benefit.
David Lawyer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &quot;unsubscribe&quot;. Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="03587" href="msg03587.html">Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> David Lawyer &lt;dave@lafn.org&gt;</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="03590" href="msg03590.html">Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Poet/Joshua Drake &lt;poet@linuxports.com&gt;</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg03595.html">Re: LinuxWorld Expo</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg03597.html">Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg03590.html">Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg03613.html">Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#03596"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#03596"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>