40 lines
1.3 KiB
HTML
40 lines
1.3 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2 Final//EN">
|
|
<HTML>
|
|
<HEAD>
|
|
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="SGML-Tools 1.0.9">
|
|
<TITLE>Bridge + Firewall + DSL Mini-HOWTO: Quirks and Problems</TITLE>
|
|
<LINK HREF="Bridge+Firewall+DSL-3.html" REL=previous>
|
|
<LINK HREF="Bridge+Firewall+DSL.html#toc4" REL=contents>
|
|
</HEAD>
|
|
<BODY>
|
|
Next
|
|
<A HREF="Bridge+Firewall+DSL-3.html">Previous</A>
|
|
<A HREF="Bridge+Firewall+DSL.html#toc4">Contents</A>
|
|
<HR>
|
|
<H2><A NAME="s4">4. Quirks and Problems</A> </H2>
|
|
|
|
<H2><A NAME="ss4.1">4.1 Odd message when using <B>ipchains -X</B></A>
|
|
</H2>
|
|
|
|
<P> The patch to add the bridgein built-in rule to ipchains makes the "delete all chains"
|
|
command, <B>ipchains -X</B>, issue the following error:
|
|
<P>
|
|
<PRE>
|
|
ipchains: Device or resource busy
|
|
|
|
</PRE>
|
|
<P> As far as I can tell this is harmless. I suspect that ipchains does not
|
|
understand that the new bridgein rule is a builtin.
|
|
<H2><A NAME="ss4.2">4.2 Shared Interrupts</A>
|
|
</H2>
|
|
|
|
<P>As I mentioned in
|
|
<A HREF="Bridge+Firewall+DSL-3.html#Hardware Setup">Hardware Setup</A>, at least for PCI NIC's
|
|
you do not want to share interrupts between the two cards (or probably with any other device).
|
|
<HR>
|
|
Next
|
|
<A HREF="Bridge+Firewall+DSL-3.html">Previous</A>
|
|
<A HREF="Bridge+Firewall+DSL.html#toc4">Contents</A>
|
|
</BODY>
|
|
</HTML>
|