158 lines
2.4 KiB
HTML
158 lines
2.4 KiB
HTML
<HTML
|
|
><HEAD
|
|
><TITLE
|
|
>Thoughts on Schneider Digital's driver</TITLE
|
|
><META
|
|
NAME="GENERATOR"
|
|
CONTENT="Modular DocBook HTML Stylesheet Version 1.7"><LINK
|
|
REL="HOME"
|
|
TITLE="ATI R200 + XFree86 4.x mini-HOWTO"
|
|
HREF="index.html"><LINK
|
|
REL="UP"
|
|
TITLE="The alternatives"
|
|
HREF="alternatives.html"><LINK
|
|
REL="PREVIOUS"
|
|
TITLE="Experiences with the GATOS project's driver"
|
|
HREF="alt4.html"><LINK
|
|
REL="NEXT"
|
|
TITLE="Still Haven't Chosen One?"
|
|
HREF="choice_rec.html"></HEAD
|
|
><BODY
|
|
CLASS="sect1"
|
|
BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"
|
|
TEXT="#000000"
|
|
LINK="#0000FF"
|
|
VLINK="#840084"
|
|
ALINK="#0000FF"
|
|
><DIV
|
|
CLASS="NAVHEADER"
|
|
><TABLE
|
|
SUMMARY="Header navigation table"
|
|
WIDTH="100%"
|
|
BORDER="0"
|
|
CELLPADDING="0"
|
|
CELLSPACING="0"
|
|
><TR
|
|
><TH
|
|
COLSPAN="3"
|
|
ALIGN="center"
|
|
>ATI R200 + XFree86 4.x mini-HOWTO</TH
|
|
></TR
|
|
><TR
|
|
><TD
|
|
WIDTH="10%"
|
|
ALIGN="left"
|
|
VALIGN="bottom"
|
|
><A
|
|
HREF="alt4.html"
|
|
ACCESSKEY="P"
|
|
>Prev</A
|
|
></TD
|
|
><TD
|
|
WIDTH="80%"
|
|
ALIGN="center"
|
|
VALIGN="bottom"
|
|
>Chapter 3. The alternatives</TD
|
|
><TD
|
|
WIDTH="10%"
|
|
ALIGN="right"
|
|
VALIGN="bottom"
|
|
><A
|
|
HREF="choice_rec.html"
|
|
ACCESSKEY="N"
|
|
>Next</A
|
|
></TD
|
|
></TR
|
|
></TABLE
|
|
><HR
|
|
ALIGN="LEFT"
|
|
WIDTH="100%"></DIV
|
|
><DIV
|
|
CLASS="sect1"
|
|
><H1
|
|
CLASS="sect1"
|
|
><A
|
|
NAME="alt5"
|
|
></A
|
|
>3.5. Thoughts on Schneider Digital's driver</H1
|
|
><P
|
|
>This alternative is another 3rd party alternative, but this one's rather good.
|
|
<A
|
|
HREF="http://www.schneider-digital.de/"
|
|
TARGET="_top"
|
|
>Schneider Digital</A
|
|
> provides drivers for various
|
|
cards, among them <A
|
|
HREF="http://www.schneider-digital.de/html/download_ati.html"
|
|
TARGET="_top"
|
|
>ATI R200/R300</A
|
|
>. The drivers are made for XFree 4.1+, and seem rather well developed.
|
|
Note though that I haven't yet tried these drivers myself, but I still thinkt they look like a very
|
|
decent alternative.
|
|
</P
|
|
></DIV
|
|
><DIV
|
|
CLASS="NAVFOOTER"
|
|
><HR
|
|
ALIGN="LEFT"
|
|
WIDTH="100%"><TABLE
|
|
SUMMARY="Footer navigation table"
|
|
WIDTH="100%"
|
|
BORDER="0"
|
|
CELLPADDING="0"
|
|
CELLSPACING="0"
|
|
><TR
|
|
><TD
|
|
WIDTH="33%"
|
|
ALIGN="left"
|
|
VALIGN="top"
|
|
><A
|
|
HREF="alt4.html"
|
|
ACCESSKEY="P"
|
|
>Prev</A
|
|
></TD
|
|
><TD
|
|
WIDTH="34%"
|
|
ALIGN="center"
|
|
VALIGN="top"
|
|
><A
|
|
HREF="index.html"
|
|
ACCESSKEY="H"
|
|
>Home</A
|
|
></TD
|
|
><TD
|
|
WIDTH="33%"
|
|
ALIGN="right"
|
|
VALIGN="top"
|
|
><A
|
|
HREF="choice_rec.html"
|
|
ACCESSKEY="N"
|
|
>Next</A
|
|
></TD
|
|
></TR
|
|
><TR
|
|
><TD
|
|
WIDTH="33%"
|
|
ALIGN="left"
|
|
VALIGN="top"
|
|
>Experiences with the GATOS project's driver</TD
|
|
><TD
|
|
WIDTH="34%"
|
|
ALIGN="center"
|
|
VALIGN="top"
|
|
><A
|
|
HREF="alternatives.html"
|
|
ACCESSKEY="U"
|
|
>Up</A
|
|
></TD
|
|
><TD
|
|
WIDTH="33%"
|
|
ALIGN="right"
|
|
VALIGN="top"
|
|
>Still Haven't Chosen One?</TD
|
|
></TR
|
|
></TABLE
|
|
></DIV
|
|
></BODY
|
|
></HTML
|
|
> |