old-www/HOWTO/Infrared-HOWTO/infrared-howto-s-beyond-ird...

300 lines
7.1 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML
><HEAD
><TITLE
>Beyond IrDA</TITLE
><META
NAME="GENERATOR"
CONTENT="Modular DocBook HTML Stylesheet Version 1.7"><LINK
REL="HOME"
TITLE="Linux Infrared HOWTO"
HREF="index.html"><LINK
REL="UP"
TITLE="Advanced Topics"
HREF="infrared-howto-c-advanced-topics.html"><LINK
REL="PREVIOUS"
TITLE="Power Saving"
HREF="infrared-howto-s-power-saving.html"><LINK
REL="NEXT"
TITLE="IrDA Network Neighborhood"
HREF="infrared-howto-s-network-neighborhood.html"></HEAD
><BODY
CLASS="sect1"
BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"
TEXT="#000000"
LINK="#0000FF"
VLINK="#840084"
ALINK="#0000FF"
><DIV
CLASS="NAVHEADER"
><TABLE
SUMMARY="Header navigation table"
WIDTH="100%"
BORDER="0"
CELLPADDING="0"
CELLSPACING="0"
><TR
><TH
COLSPAN="3"
ALIGN="center"
>Linux Infrared HOWTO</TH
></TR
><TR
><TD
WIDTH="10%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="bottom"
><A
HREF="infrared-howto-s-power-saving.html"
ACCESSKEY="P"
>Prev</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="80%"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="bottom"
>Chapter 5. Advanced Topics</TD
><TD
WIDTH="10%"
ALIGN="right"
VALIGN="bottom"
><A
HREF="infrared-howto-s-network-neighborhood.html"
ACCESSKEY="N"
>Next</A
></TD
></TR
></TABLE
><HR
ALIGN="LEFT"
WIDTH="100%"></DIV
><DIV
CLASS="sect1"
><H1
CLASS="sect1"
><A
NAME="infrared-howto-s-beyond-irda"
></A
>5.6. Beyond IrDA</H1
><DIV
CLASS="sect2"
><H2
CLASS="sect2"
><A
NAME="AEN1459"
></A
>5.6.1. Extending Transmission Distance</H2
><P
>&#13; According to the IrDA specification the range is up to 1 meter. From
the "IrDA Data Link Design Guide" p. 20 by
<A
HREF="http://www.hp.com/go/ir"
TARGET="_top"
>Hewlett-Packard</A
>
: " In some cases it may be desired to
increase link distance beyond the 1 meter guaranteed by IrDA. The two
ways to do this are to increase transmitted light intensity, or to
increase receiver sensitivity. In order to extend the link distance,
both sensitivity and intensity must be increased for both ends of the
IR link. If it is desired to communicate with a standard IrDA device
that may have minimum transmitter intensity, the receiver intensity
must be increased. The standard IrDA device may also have minimum
receiver sensitivity, so transmitter intensity must also be
increased."
</P
><P
>&#13; Andreas Butz wrote: "This might be a silly question, but has anyone an
idea whether the whole IrDA stack really relies on a two-way
connection, or whether there are some parts of it that could be abused
for a one-way connection, ideally for unreliable data? We're trying to
modify some IR dongles to broadcast information to palm pilots over
several meters distance (cover a whole room), and since we don't want
to modify the pilots themselves, and increasing the sensitivity on the
receiver side seems unlikely to work, we're stuck with a one way
link.". Please see the mailing list archive for details of the
discussion.
</P
><P
>&#13; Sent by Marc Bury " .. just heard about some
Philips new scheme for remote controls: they call it IRDA - Control.
This is supposed to be bi-directional, 75 kbps data rate, multiple
simultaneous devices (up to 8) and with a minimum 6 meter range!" More
information at
<A
HREF="http://www.irda.org/"
TARGET="_top"
>IrDA.org</A
> .
</P
><P
>&#13; The German magazine ELEKTOR issued a guide to build a Long Distance
IrDA Dongle (20m, RS232, IrDA 1.0),
<A
HREF="http://www.elektor.de"
TARGET="_top"
>ELEKTOR</A
>
5/97 p.
</P
><P
>&#13; <SPAN
CLASS="QUOTE"
>"The main problem is that you generally have to
make the receiver more sensitive. Basic physics has the inverse square
law: the intensity drops with the SQUARE of the distance, so going
from 1 to 5 meters requires 25x the power (and battery drain on a
portable device), or 25x the sensitivity (and dynamic range - it still
has to be able to work at 3 inches). And if you want to do it on the
other end, it doesn't simply have to be 25x more sensitive, it must
pick up the tiny IrDA pulse needle in a haystack of florescent lights,
screen savers, moving shadows ..."</SPAN
>
</P
><P
>&#13; Also laser diodes (pulsable) were recommended by K-H. Eischer: But they
are more expensive. And the laser diodes are also dangerous if they
have more than 1 mW. A better solution would be to use lenses to focus
the beam. There is a minimum of absorbtion in the air (I don't know
the right frequency) and you should use IR diodes with this frequency.
</P
><P
>&#13; James wrote: " Who ever it was wanting to do long distance with IrDA,
we've tried this before. The best approaches are:
</P
><P
>&#13;
<P
></P
><UL
><LI
><P
>&#13; wavelan - buy the cards but not the antennas you can make your own
with equaly good gain as the $9000 type they sell here.
</P
></LI
><LI
><P
>&#13; microwave - you can pick up X-band doppler radar modules, tune
them slightly apart and use the your local TX as the LO for the
incomming RX, the whole thing behaves like ethernet and you can
hook it onto an AUI port, this may now be illegal.
</P
></LI
><LI
><P
>&#13; ir - Many people sell kits which transmit video over Ir, they come
complete with the large fresnel lense you need, they manage about
4MHz b/w over 100m.
</P
></LI
><LI
><P
>&#13; laser diodes - when we looked at these they were a pain, I think
elantec make decent drivers but modulating them was a big pain,
Steve Carcia had a series on articles on modulating He-Ne lasers
but be careful they have lots of volts in them that want to get
out and kill you.
</P
></LI
></UL
>
</P
><P
>&#13; Whatever you choose IrDA might very well be a good choice for a
protocol, given it's one of the few that sensibly copes with simplex."
</P
><P
>&#13; Here are some links to
<A
HREF="http://repair4laptop.org/notebook_irda_selfmade.html"
TARGET="_top"
>do-it-yourself InfraRed (IrDA) devices</A
>
to use with your laptop, notebook, PDA or mobile phone.
</P
></DIV
><DIV
CLASS="sect2"
><H2
CLASS="sect2"
><A
NAME="AEN1485"
></A
>5.6.2. Upcoming Standards (Bluetooth and IrDA)</H2
><P
>&#13; "More and more people now think that IrDA and Bluetooth will live
happily side by side, and the idea of Bluetooth as the IrDA killer
just don't work anymore. IrDA is still unbeatable in price/performance
and with the new additions to the standards family like AIR and VFIR,
it's really good to see that IrDA is moving in the right direction."
</P
></DIV
></DIV
><DIV
CLASS="NAVFOOTER"
><HR
ALIGN="LEFT"
WIDTH="100%"><TABLE
SUMMARY="Footer navigation table"
WIDTH="100%"
BORDER="0"
CELLPADDING="0"
CELLSPACING="0"
><TR
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="infrared-howto-s-power-saving.html"
ACCESSKEY="P"
>Prev</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="34%"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="index.html"
ACCESSKEY="H"
>Home</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="right"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="infrared-howto-s-network-neighborhood.html"
ACCESSKEY="N"
>Next</A
></TD
></TR
><TR
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="top"
>Power Saving</TD
><TD
WIDTH="34%"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="infrared-howto-c-advanced-topics.html"
ACCESSKEY="U"
>Up</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="right"
VALIGN="top"
>IrDA Network Neighborhood</TD
></TR
></TABLE
></DIV
></BODY
></HTML
>