After some discussions with Jann Horn, perhaps a better way of
dealing with an invalid target pathname is to trigger an
error for the system call.
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
From a conversation with Jann Horn:
[[
>>>> struct seccomp_notif_resp *resp = malloc(sizes.seccomp_notif_resp);
>>>
>>> This should probably do something like max(sizes.seccomp_notif_resp,
>>> sizeof(struct seccomp_notif_resp)) in case the program was built
>>> against new UAPI headers that make struct seccomp_notif_resp big, but
>>> is running under an old kernel where that struct is still smaller?
>>
>> I'm confused. Why? I mean, if the running kernel says that it expects
>> a buffer of a certain size, and we allocate a buffer of that size,
>> what's the problem?
>
> Because in userspace, we cast the result of malloc() to a "struct
> seccomp_notif_resp *". If the kernel tells us that it expects a size
> smaller than sizeof(struct seccomp_notif_resp), then we end up with a
> pointer to a struct that consists partly of allocated memory, partly
> of out-of-bounds memory, which is generally a bad idea - I'm not sure
> whether the C standard permits that. And if userspace then e.g.
> decides to access some member of that struct that is beyond what the
> kernel thinks is the struct size, we get actual OOB memory accesses.
Got it. (But gosh, this seems like a fragile API mess.)
I added the following to the code:
/* When allocating the response buffer, we must allow for the fact
that the user-space binary may have been built with user-space
headers where 'struct seccomp_notif_resp' is bigger than the
response buffer expected by the (older) kernel. Therefore, we
allocate a buffer that is the maximum of the two sizes. This
ensures that if the supervisor places bytes into the response
structure that are past the response size that the kernel expects,
then the supervisor is not touching an invalid memory location. */
size_t resp_size = sizes.seccomp_notif_resp;
if (sizeof(struct seccomp_notif_resp) > resp_size)
resp_size = sizeof(struct seccomp_notif_resp);
struct seccomp_notif_resp *resp = malloc(resp_size);
]]
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
From a conversation with Jann Horn:
>> We should probably make sure here that the value we read is actually
>> NUL-terminated?
>
> So, I was curious about that point also. But, (why) are we not
> guaranteed that it will be NUL-terminated?
Because it's random memory filled by another process, which we don't
necessarily trust. While seccomp notifiers aren't usable for applying
*extra* security restrictions, the supervisor will still often be more
privileged than the supervised process.
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Change "read(2) will return 0" to "read(2) may return 0".
Quoting Jann Horn:
Maybe make that "may return 0" instead of "will return 0" -
reading from /proc/$pid/mem can only return 0 in the
following cases AFAICS:
1. task->mm was already gone at open() time
2. mm->mm_users has dropped to zero (the mm only has lazytlb
users; page tables and VMAs are being blown away or have
been blown away)
3. the syscall was called with length 0
When a process has gone away, normally mm->mm_users will
drop to zero, but someone else could theoretically still be
holding a reference to the mm (e.g. someone else in the
middle of accessing /proc/$pid/mem). (Such references
should normally not be very long-lived though.)
Additionally, in the unlikely case that the OOM killer just
chomped through the page tables of the target process, I
think the read will return -EIO (same error as if the
address was simply unmapped) if the address is within a
non-shared mapping. (Maybe that's something procfs could do
better...)
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Add some strongly worded text warning the reader about the correct
uses of seccomp user-space notification.
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cowritten-by: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cowritten-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
The APIs used by this mechanism comprise not only seccomp(2), but
also a number of ioctl(2) operations. And any useful example
demonstrating these APIs is will necessarily be rather long.
Trying to cram all of this into the seccomp(2) page would make
that page unmanageably long. Therefore, let's document this
mechanism in a separate page.
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
The existing text says the structures (plural!) contain a 'struct
seccomp_data'. But this is only true for the received notification
structure (seccomp_notif). So, reword the sentence to be more
general, noting simply that the structures may evolve over time.
Add some comments to the structure definition.
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Rework the description a little, and note that the close-on-exec
flag is set for the returned file descriptor.
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
I can't see a reason to include it. <fcntl.h> provides O_*
constants for 'flags', S_* constants for 'mode', and mode_t.
Probably a long time ago, some of those weren't defined in
<fcntl.h>, and both headers needed to be included, or maybe it's
a historical error.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
My previous patch intended to drop the docs for the lockdown lift
SysRq, but it missed this other section that refers to lifting it
via a keyboard - an allusion to that same SysRq.
Signed-off-by: dann frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
The patch that implemented lockdown lifting via SysRq ended up
getting dropped[*] before the feature was merged upstream. Having
the feature documented but unsupported has caused some confusion
for our users.
[*] http://archive.lwn.net:8080/linux-kernel/CACdnJuuxAM06TcnczOA6NwxhnmQUeqqm3Ma8btukZpuCS+dOqg@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: dann frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com>
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Pedro Principeza <pedro.principeza@canonical.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Michael Kerrisk