From the email discussion:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 9/25/20 9:31 AM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> man2/seccomp.2 | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/man2/seccomp.2 b/man2/seccomp.2
>> index 58033da1c..d6b856c32 100644
>> --- a/man2/seccomp.2
>> +++ b/man2/seccomp.2
>> @@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ install_filter(int syscall_nr, int t_arch, int f_errno)
>> };
>>
>> struct sock_fprog prog = {
>> - .len = (unsigned short) (sizeof(filter) / sizeof(filter[0])),
>> + .len = sizeof(filter) / sizeof(filter[0]),
>> .filter = filter,
>> };
>
> I have a small doubt about this change. With the change,
> there are no compilation warnings.
>
> But, if we change the code to something slightly different:
>
> [[
> size_t x = (sizeof(filter) / sizeof(filter[0]));
> struct sock_fprog prog = {
> .len = x,
> .filter = filter,
> };
> ]]
>
> The "cc -Wconversion" gives us the following warning:
>
> warning: conversion from ‘size_t’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’}
> to ‘short unsigned int’ may change value
>
> Presumably we don't get a warning for an assignment of the form
>
> .len = (sizeof(filter) / sizeof(filter[0]))
>
> because the compiler is smart enough to work out that the
> value of the constant expression is within the range of
> "unsigned short".
>
> Your thoughts?
Hi Michael,
I'd say that the cast doesn't fix any problems at all. It silences a
valid warning, and I'd use a pragma for that (to be more explicit about
the intention of silencing a warning) if I do want -Wconversion enabled
(which usually I don't want, because it's too noisy) and I'm sure that
this won't overflow. I'd limit the use casts to only when I *really*
need to.
I guess that if you enable -O3, the warning will vanish again because
the compiler will optimize away 'x' (but I didn't test).
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Use \(aq to get an unslanted single quote inside monospace code
blocks. Using a simple ' results in a slanted quote inside PDFs.
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
These variables are either of an unsigned integer type per POSIX;
or of an integer type per POSIX, that Linux defines as an unsigned integer type.
Print them with 'uintmax_t' instead of 'intmax_t' to avoid
big positive numbers being printed as negative numbers.
Bug report:
From: Konstantin Bukin @ 2020-09-13 15:04 UTC
To: mtk.manpages; +Cc: Konstantin Bukin, linux-man
inode numbers are expected to be positive. Casting them to a signed type
may result in printing negative values. E.g. running example program on
the following file:
$ ls -li test.txt
9280843260537405888 -r--r--r-- 1 kbukin hardware 300 Jul 21 06:36 test.txt
results in the following output:
$ ./example test.txt
ID of containing device: [0,480]
File type: regular file
I-node number: -9165900813172145728
Mode: 100444 (octal)
Link count: 1
Ownership: UID=2743 GID=30
Preferred I/O block size: 32768 bytes
File size: 300 bytes
Blocks allocated: 8
Last status change: Tue Jul 21 06:36:50 2020
Last file access: Sat Sep 12 14:13:38 2020
Last file modification: Tue Jul 21 06:36:50 2020
Such erroneous reporting happens for inode values greater than maximum
value which can be stored in signed long. Casting does not seem to be
necessary here. Printing inode as unsigned long fixes the issue.
Reported-by: Konstantin Bukin <kbukin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Various ports that had their own indigenous system calls have
been discontinued. Remove those system calls (none of which had
manual pages!) to a separate part of the page, to avoid
cluttering the main list of system calls.
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Some of the links removed in commit 247c654385 should
have been kept, because in some cases there are real system
calls whose wrapper functions are documented in Section 3.
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Let's move to the 21st century. Instead of casting system data
types to long/long long/etc. in printf() calls, instead cast to
intmax_t or uintmax_t, the largest available signed/unsigned
integer types.
[mtk: rewrote commit message]
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Use printf()'s '#' flag character to prepend the string "0x".
However, when the number is printed in uppercase, and the prefix
is in lowercase, the string "0x" needs to be manually written.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
For consistency.
The types are written both with and without the redundant 'int' keyword
all over the man-pages. However, the most used form, by far, is the one
without 'int'.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Notes: I copied .nf and .fi from futex.2, but they made no visual difference.
What do they actually do?
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
When calling msgrcv() with the MSG_COPY flag, it will report
EINVAL error even we if have disabled CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE.
ENOSYS will be reported only if we also specify the IPC_NOWAIT
flag.
[mtk: edited commit message]
Notes from mtk:
The relevant kernel code is this:
[[
#ifdef CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
...
#else
static inline struct msg_msg *prepare_copy(void __user *buf, size_t bufsz)
{
return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
}
...
static long do_msgrcv(int msqid, void __user *buf, size_t bufsz, long
msgtyp, int msgflg,
long (*msg_handler)(void __user *, struct msg_msg *, size_t))
{
...
if (msgflg & MSG_COPY) {
if ((msgflg & MSG_EXCEPT) || !(msgflg & IPC_NOWAIT))
return -EINVAL;
copy = prepare_copy(buf, min_t(size_t, bufsz, ns->msg_ctlmax));
...
}
]]
We'll only hit the ENOSYS error if:
(1) MSG_COPY was specified;
(2) IPC_NOWAIT was not specified; and
(3) CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE was not enabled.
Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
The type `struct msgbuf *` is implicitly casted to `const void *`.
Not only that, but the explicit cast to `void *` was slightly
misleading.
Explicitly casting can silence warnings when mistakes are made, so it's
better to remove those casts when possible.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Rather than:
sometype x;
for (x = ....; ...)
use
for (sometype x = ...; ...)
This brings the declaration and use closer together (thus aiding
readability) and also clearly indicates the scope of the loop
counter variable.
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Use ``sizeof`` consistently through all the examples in the following
way:
- Use the name of the variable instead of its type as argument for
``sizeof``.
Rationale:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.8/process/coding-style.html#allocating-memory
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Use ``sizeof`` consistently through all the examples in the following
way:
- Use the name of the variable instead of its type as argument for
``sizeof``.
Rationale:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.8/process/coding-style.html#allocating-memory
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Use ``sizeof`` consistently through all the examples in the following
way:
- Use the name of the variable instead of its type as argument for
``sizeof``.
Rationale:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.8/process/coding-style.html#allocating-memory
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Use ``sizeof`` consistently through all the examples in the following
way:
- Use the name of the variable instead of its type as argument for
``sizeof``.
Rationale:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.8/process/coding-style.html#allocating-memory
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Use ``sizeof`` consistently through all the examples in the following
way:
- Use the name of the variable instead of its type as argument for
``sizeof``.
Rationale:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.8/process/coding-style.html#allocating-memory
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Use ``sizeof`` consistently through all the examples in the following
way:
- Use the name of the variable instead of its type as argument for
``sizeof``.
Rationale:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.8/process/coding-style.html#allocating-memory
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Use ``sizeof`` consistently through all the examples in the following
way:
- Use the name of the variable instead of its type as argument for
``sizeof``.
Rationale:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.8/process/coding-style.html#allocating-memory
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Ira Weiny