mirror of https://github.com/mkerrisk/man-pages
pivot_root.2: Add some more detail to the remaining EBUSY error
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
071505e9fb
commit
b647c4c93a
|
@ -115,7 +115,28 @@ may fail with any of the same errors as
|
|||
Additionally, it may fail with the following errors:
|
||||
.TP
|
||||
.B EBUSY
|
||||
\fInew_root\fP or \fIput_old\fP are on the current root filesystem.
|
||||
.\" Reconfirmed that the following error occurs on Linux 5.0 by
|
||||
.\" specifying 'new_root' as "/rootfs" and 'put_old' as
|
||||
.\" "/rootfs/oldrootfs", and *not* bind mounting "/rootfs" on top of
|
||||
.\" itself. Of course, this is an odd situation, since a later check
|
||||
.\" in the kernel code will in any case yield EINVAL if 'new_root' is
|
||||
.\" not a mount point. However, when the system call was first added,
|
||||
.\" 'new_root' was not required to be a mount point. So, this this
|
||||
.\" error is nowadays probably just the result of crufty accumulation.
|
||||
.\" This error can also occur if we bind mount "/" on top of itself
|
||||
.\" and try to specify "/" as the 'new' (again, an odd situation). So,
|
||||
.\" the EBUSY check in the kernel does still seem necessary to prevent
|
||||
.\" that case. Furthermore, the "or put_old" piece is probably
|
||||
.\" redundant text (although the check is in the kernel), since,
|
||||
.\" in another check, 'put_old' is required to be under 'new_root'.
|
||||
.I new_root
|
||||
or
|
||||
.I put_old
|
||||
is on the current root filesystem.
|
||||
(This error covers the pathological case where
|
||||
.I new_root
|
||||
is
|
||||
.IR """/""" .)
|
||||
.TP
|
||||
.B EINVAL
|
||||
.I new_root
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue