mirror of https://github.com/mkerrisk/man-pages
fcntl.2: Refine discussion of locks when NFSv4 client loses contact with server
Reported-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6ca357f965
commit
af8713605a
14
man2/fcntl.2
14
man2/fcntl.2
|
@ -1275,8 +1275,18 @@ Clearly,
|
|||
alone is not going to be very useful if the process holding the lock
|
||||
may live on a different machine.
|
||||
|
||||
Before Linux 3.12, if an NFS client
|
||||
is out of contact with the server for a period of time,
|
||||
Before Linux 3.12, if an NFSv4 client
|
||||
loses contact with the server for a period of time
|
||||
(defined as more than 90 seconds with no communication),
|
||||
.\" FIXME: The 90 seconds is either /proc/fs/nfsd/nfsv4leasetime or
|
||||
.\" /proc/fs/nfsd/nfsv4gracetime. Which is it? My suspicion, looking at
|
||||
.\" fs/lockd/svcproc.c and fs/lockd/grace.c::locks_in_grace() is that
|
||||
.\" it is /proc/fs/nfsd/nfsv4gracetime that is relevant here.
|
||||
.\"
|
||||
.\" Neil Brown: With NFSv3 the failure mode is the reverse. If
|
||||
.\" the server loses contact with a client then any lock stays in place
|
||||
.\" indefinitely ("why can't I read my mail"... I remember it well).
|
||||
.\"
|
||||
it might lose and regain a lock without ever being aware of the fact.
|
||||
This scenario potentially risks data corruption,
|
||||
since another process might acquire a lock in the intervening period
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue