mirror of https://github.com/mkerrisk/man-pages
clock_getres.2: Move text in BUGS to NOTES
The fact that CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID and CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID are not settable isn't a bug, since POSIX does allow the possibility that these clocks are not settable. Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6cfa7458f7
commit
a215069794
|
@ -300,6 +300,16 @@ function; nor on the expiration of relative timers based upon this clock.
|
|||
Consequently, these time services shall expire when the requested relative
|
||||
interval elapses, independently of the new or old value of the clock.
|
||||
.RE
|
||||
.PP
|
||||
According to POSIX.1-2001, a process with "appropriate privileges" may set the
|
||||
.B CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID
|
||||
and
|
||||
.B CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID
|
||||
clocks using
|
||||
.BR clock_settime ().
|
||||
On Linux, these clocks are not settable
|
||||
(i.e., no process has "appropriate privileges").
|
||||
.\" See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11972
|
||||
.\"
|
||||
.SS C library/kernel differences
|
||||
On some architectures, an implementation of
|
||||
|
@ -348,16 +358,6 @@ and
|
|||
.BR CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID ,
|
||||
on systems that provide such an implementation
|
||||
(i.e., Linux 2.6.12 and later).
|
||||
.SH BUGS
|
||||
According to POSIX.1-2001, a process with "appropriate privileges" may set the
|
||||
.B CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID
|
||||
and
|
||||
.B CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID
|
||||
clocks using
|
||||
.BR clock_settime ().
|
||||
On Linux, these clocks are not settable
|
||||
(i.e., no process has "appropriate privileges").
|
||||
.\" See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11972
|
||||
.SH SEE ALSO
|
||||
.BR date (1),
|
||||
.BR gettimeofday (2),
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue