From 8cbbe3eeaf54cdd9926da6dccea41996fbe351a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Kerrisk Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:39:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] attributes.7: Comment out !posix text Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk --- man7/attributes.7 | 23 ++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/man7/attributes.7 b/man7/attributes.7 index c636b5c14..51b497197 100644 --- a/man7/attributes.7 +++ b/man7/attributes.7 @@ -804,17 +804,18 @@ avoiding the option may be a good alternative to using full pathnames or file descriptor-relative (e.g., .BR openat (2)) system calls. -.TP -.I !posix -This remark, as an MT-Safety, AS-Safety or AC-Safety note to a function, -indicates the safety status of the function is known to differ -from the specified status in the POSIX standard. -For example, POSIX does not require a function to be Safe, -but our implementation is, or vice-versa. - -For the time being, the absence of this remark does not imply the safety -properties we documented are identical to those mandated by POSIX for -the corresponding functions. +.\" .TP +.\" .I !posix +.\" This remark, as an MT-Safety, AS-Safety or AC-Safety +.\" note to a function, +.\" indicates the safety status of the function is known to differ +.\" from the specified status in the POSIX standard. +.\" For example, POSIX does not require a function to be Safe, +.\" but our implementation is, or vice-versa. +.\" +.\" For the time being, the absence of this remark does not imply the safety +.\" properties we documented are identical to those mandated by POSIX for +.\" the corresponding functions. .TP .I :identifier Annotations may sometimes be followed by identifiers,