request_key.2: Add links to some keyrings pages

Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Michael Kerrisk 2017-02-09 14:11:41 +01:00
parent bfedb010d2
commit 7f1f4badb3
1 changed files with 15 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -131,23 +131,33 @@ since Linux 2.6.29).
.\" won't refer to a keyring. Have I misunderstood?
.IP \(bu
The thread-specific keyring
.RB ( KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_THREAD_KEYRING ).
.RB ( KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_THREAD_KEYRING ;
see
.BR thread-keyring (7)).
.IP \(bu
The process-specific keyring
.RB ( KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_PROCESS_KEYRING ).
.RB ( KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_PROCESS_KEYRING ;
see
.BR process-keyring (7)).
.IP \(bu
The session-specific keyring
.RB ( KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_SESSION_KEYRING ).
.RB ( KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_SESSION_KEYRING ;
see
.BR session-keyring (7)).
.IP \(bu
The session keyring for the process's user ID
.RB ( KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_USER_SESSION_KEYRING ).
.RB ( KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_USER_SESSION_KEYRING ;
see
.BR user-session-keyring (7)).
This keyring is expected to always exist.
.\" FIXME
.\" Are there circumstances where the session keyring does not exist?
.\" What are they?
.IP \(bu
The UID-specific keyring
.RB ( KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_USER_KEYRING ).
.RB ( KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_USER_KEYRING ;
see
.BR user-keyring (7)).
This keyring is also expected to always exist.
.\" FIXME
.\" Are there circumstances where the UID-specific keyring does not exist?