mirror of https://github.com/mkerrisk/man-pages
Added comment on inconsistent naming of *at() functions.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6057e7a9fa
commit
6d03c00944
|
@ -111,6 +111,14 @@ A similar system call exists on Solaris.
|
|||
.\" primarily referred to "extended *at*tributes", which are
|
||||
.\" handled by Solaris' O_XATTR flag, but was also intended
|
||||
.\" to refer to the notion of "at a relative location".
|
||||
.\"
|
||||
.\" See also the following for a discussion of the inconsistent
|
||||
.\" naming of the *at() functions:
|
||||
.\" http://www.opengroup.org/austin/mailarchives/ag/msg09103.html
|
||||
.\" Subject: RE: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
|
||||
.\" From: Don Cragun
|
||||
.\" Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:56:50 -0800 (PST)
|
||||
.\"
|
||||
.SH VERSIONS
|
||||
.BR openat ()
|
||||
was added to Linux in kernel 2.6.16.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue