diff --git a/LDP/ldpwn/20050309.xml b/LDP/ldpwn/20050309.xml
index 2055aaf5..d994d01a 100644
--- a/LDP/ldpwn/20050309.xml
+++ b/LDP/ldpwn/20050309.xml
@@ -11,35 +11,31 @@
The Linux Documentation Project Weekly News
-
-
-New documents @ The LDP
-
-
-
-
-
-.
-
-.
-
-.
-
-
-
-
-
Documents submitted for review
-.
+Gareth Anderson would like to include the GNU Linux Command
+Line Tools Summary document
+http://www.karakas-online.de/gnu-linux-tools-summary/introduction.html which
+he has been working on since more than two years, in The LDP collection.
+
-.
+Coert wrote a Secure Internet for Small Office / Home Office
+HOWTO. A draft version of the document is available at
+http://www.cybcon.com/~coert/linux/siso/index.html. The HOWTO describes how to
+bring up your own Firewall, Wireless Access Point and VPN Server on a single
+board computer. It currently uses the Geode SC1100 and Atheros WiFi NIC, but
+could easily be extended to include other hardware, drivers and services.
+
-.
+Zouhir Hafidi wrote a HOWTO about setting up Linux and Windows
+Terminal Services in Schools and would like to submit it to TLDP. A draft
+version of the document is available from
+http://math.univ-lille1.fr/~hafidi/terminal-services/ and your comments are
+most welcome.
@@ -51,11 +47,18 @@
-.
+lists@mjhall.org proposed to write a Computational Linguistics
+HOWTO. This HOWTO would briefly survey the major branches of contemporary
+computational linguistics and the major types of linguistics software, and then
+catalogue Linux software available in each category. An extensive bibliography
+and list of resources such as websites and mailing lists would also included.
+Some general advice would also be offered on system configuration for
+linguistics work. Martin Wheeler and Rahul Sundaram were excited about the
+idea.
-.
-
-.
+Mathieu Deschamps has offered to translate the Linuxbios guide
+to English. If you were waiting for this document to be available in English,
+this is some good news.
@@ -66,11 +69,16 @@
-.
+Version 1.6 (Last updated 20050301 Edition) of Bash Guide for
+Beginners http://www.tldp.org/LDP/Bash-Beginners-Guide/html/ by Machtelt
+Garrels has minor problems corrected, more keywords, and info about new Bash
+3.0.
-.
-
-.
+Version 1.17 (20050301 Edition) of Machtelt Garrels
+"Introduction to Linux, A Hands on Guide"
+http://www.tldp.org/LDP/intro-linux/html/ has edits for lots of little details
+that were outdated, several notes, and some more info about new apps has been
+added.
@@ -83,25 +91,36 @@
-News item title 1:
+Mirrors
+These are the latest additions to our list of mirrors:
-News item 1 body.
+
+
+ http://ldp.mirror.nickstallman.net/ - hosted by Nick
+ Stallman in Kingston, Massachusetts and updated daily.
+
+
+ http://ldp.mirror1.wefixtech.co.uk/ - hosted by Tony
+ Dodd in Ashburn, VA, USA and updated every other day.
+
+
+ http://ldp.hosting-concepts.com - hosted by Peter in
+ Amsterdam, The Netherlands and updated daily.
+
+ http://ldp.cherryfive.com - hosted by Daniel Prinsloo
+ in London, UK and updated weekly.
+
+
-News item title 2:
+Gerd Berget's report on The LDP
-News item 2 body.
-
-
-
-
-
-News item title 3:
-
-News item 3 body.
+Gerd Berget's report on The LDP is available for download from
+http://www.nyx.net/~sgjoen/rapport.pdf However, the document has not yet been
+translate to English.
@@ -116,25 +135,21 @@
-Discussion topic title 1:
+Modifiability of documentation and software
-Discussion topic 1 body.
-
-
-
-
-
-Discussion topic title 2:
-
-Discussion topic 2 body.
-
-
-
-
-
-Discussion topic title 3:
-
-Discussion topic 3 body.
+In a discussion thread concerning modifiability of documentation and
+data, Rahul Sundaram commented that most people dont care about whether the
+source code is modifiable but that, that doesn't mean we say we dont care about
+Free or open source software. David Lawyer responded indicating that there is
+a difference between software and documents. David said Software needs
+to be free since it's relatively hard to write it and much of it is reusable.
+But for documentation, the situation is a lot different. I've looked at a few
+of our old documents that are out-of-date and they mostly need to be entirely
+rewritten. This can be done even if the doc doesn't allow modification. Why?
+Because one uses the info in the obsolete doc plus information in other docs to
+write a new doc. Facts are not copyrighted.
David was in favour of
+modifiable documents, but not as stronly as Rahul was. An interesting
+discussion ensued.