From cd38bf0003436a4e2fa65fb41024bdc0d0d70510 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: appaji <>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 20:43:05 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ispelled, sid rendered, ready to publish

---
 LDP/ldpwn/20050309.xml | 14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/LDP/ldpwn/20050309.xml b/LDP/ldpwn/20050309.xml
index d994d01a..2186ec97 100644
--- a/LDP/ldpwn/20050309.xml
+++ b/LDP/ldpwn/20050309.xml
@@ -56,10 +56,6 @@ Some general advice would also be offered on system configuration for
 linguistics work.  Martin Wheeler and Rahul Sundaram were excited about the
 idea. </para></listitem>
 
-<listitem><para>Mathieu Deschamps has offered to translate the Linuxbios guide
-to English.  If you were waiting for this document to be available in English,
-this is some good news.  </para></listitem>
-
 </itemizedlist>
 
 </sect1>
@@ -77,8 +73,8 @@ Garrels has minor problems corrected, more keywords, and info about new Bash
 <listitem><para>Version 1.17 (20050301 Edition) of Machtelt Garrels
 "Introduction to Linux, A Hands on Guide"
 http://www.tldp.org/LDP/intro-linux/html/ has edits for lots of little details
-that were outdated, several notes, and some more info about new apps has been
-added.</para></listitem>
+that were outdated, several notes, and some more info about new application has
+been added.</para></listitem>
 
 </itemizedlist>
 
@@ -138,8 +134,8 @@ translate to English.  </para>
 <para>Modifiability of documentation and software</para>
 
 <para>In a discussion thread concerning modifiability of documentation and
-data, Rahul Sundaram commented that most people dont care about whether the
-source code is modifiable but that, that doesn't mean we say we dont care about
+data, Rahul Sundaram commented that most people don't care about whether the
+source code is modifiable but that, that doesn't mean we say we don't care about
 Free or open source software.  David Lawyer responded indicating that there is
 a difference between software and documents.  David said <quote>Software needs
 to be free since it's relatively hard to write it and much of it is reusable.
@@ -148,7 +144,7 @@ of our old documents that are out-of-date and they mostly need to be entirely
 rewritten.  This can be done even if the doc doesn't allow modification.  Why?
 Because one uses the info in the obsolete doc plus information in other docs to
 write a new doc.  Facts are not copyrighted.</quote>  David was in favour of
-modifiable documents, but not as stronly as Rahul was.  An interesting
+modifiable documents, but not as strongly as Rahul was.  An interesting
 discussion ensued.  </para>
 
 </listitem>